Re: [arch-general] very out of date packages

2016-08-15 Thread Genes Lists via arch-general
On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 15:27 -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > I would argue it is not the raw number or percentage of packages that > are out of date, but *which* packages are out of date.  For example, > I > wouldn't place equal weight on pychess as I would glibc.    Agree with this completely -

Re: [arch-general] very out of date packages

2016-08-14 Thread mike lojkovic via arch-general
There's a refind-efi package up on the aur as well.

Re: [arch-general] very out of date packages

2016-08-14 Thread Dutch Ingraham
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 03:19:29PM -0400, Ido Rosen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Ido Rosen wrote: > > Although, it's worth noting, 220/14800 (<2%) of out of date packages at any > given time (and <0.2% badly out of date) isn't that bad... I would argue it is not the raw number or pe

Re: [arch-general] very out of date packages

2016-08-14 Thread Ido Rosen
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Ido Rosen wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> >> refind-efi has been flagged out of date for 9 months. >> Are there any packagers who would be willing to take this one over? >> >> It

Re: [arch-general] very out of date packages

2016-08-14 Thread Ido Rosen
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > refind-efi has been flagged out of date for 9 months. > Are there any packagers who would be willing to take this one over? > > It is not the most out of date even ... but it's an important > co