On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Johannes Held wrote:
> Jozsef :
> > I'm using vim all the time. Never vi.
> Little bit more in detail. How do you start "vim"?
>
> $> vim
> or
> $> vi
>
> --
> GruÃ, Johannes
> Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
> Mast und Schotbruch mit dem http://se
Jozsef :
> I'm using vim all the time. Never vi.
Little bit more in detail. How do you start "vim"?
$> vim
or
$> vi
--
GruÃ, Johannes
Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
Mast und Schotbruch mit dem http://segelsport-blog.de.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Xavier wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Jozsef wrote:
> >> >>> Which plugins in particular are you ta
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Xavier wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Jozsef wrote:
>> >>> Which plugins in particular are you talking about? Can we get an "ls
>> >>> -l ~/.vim/plugin"
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Xavier wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Jozsef wrote:
> >>> Which plugins in particular are you talking about? Can we get an "ls
> >>> -l ~/.vim/plugin" ?
> >>
> >> To move .vimrc away? but all my settings ar
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Jozsef wrote:
>>> Which plugins in particular are you talking about? Can we get an "ls
>>> -l ~/.vim/plugin" ?
>>
>> To move .vimrc away? but all my settings are in .vimrc :) how do you imagine
>> anything to work
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Jozsef wrote:
>> Which plugins in particular are you talking about? Can we get an "ls
>> -l ~/.vim/plugin" ?
>
> To move .vimrc away? but all my settings are in .vimrc :) how do you imagine
> anything to work without .vimrc?
> I don't have vi and gvim anymore. onl
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Xavier wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Aaron Griffin
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> >> >>> I never used runtimepath before
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Xavier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Aaron Griffin
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
>> >>> I never used runtimepath before and everything worked fine.
>> >
>> > You shouldn't have
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Aaron Griffin
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> >>> I never used runtimepath before and everything worked fine.
> >
> > You shouldn't have to. It is set by default by vim. In a running vim
> > in
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
>>> I never used runtimepath before and everything worked fine.
>
> You shouldn't have to. It is set by default by vim. In a running vim instance
> do
> :echo &runtimepath
>
To Jozsef :
pleas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
>> I never used runtimepath before and everything worked fine.
You shouldn't have to. It is set by default by vim. In a running vim instance do
:echo &runtimepath
>> And I don't have a "after" directory in /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/ at the
>> moment
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Jozsef wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hrrm, I don't know if we should be using the 'after' dir for default
> > > plugins installed by pacman. It seem like these actually belong in
> > > /usr/sh
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >
> > Hrrm, I don't know if we should be using the 'after' dir for default
> > plugins installed by pacman. It seem like these actually belong in
> > /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/plugin/. The after directory has
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
> Hrrm, I don't know if we should be using the 'after' dir for default
> plugins installed by pacman. It seem like these actually belong in
> /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/plugin/. The after directory has a special
> purpose, and none of the plugins I can thin
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
>>
>> There is a /usr/share/vim folder and inside of it /plugin, /vim72 and
>> /vimfiles
>> I tried to copy my files from ~/.vim to all of that places and nothing
>> worked. Don't know what to try else.
>
> We try to be more compliant with
>
> There is a /usr/share/vim folder and inside of it /plugin, /vim72 and
> /vimfiles
> I tried to copy my files from ~/.vim to all of that places and nothing
> worked. Don't know what to try else.
We try to be more compliant with upstream vim: the out of the box path
consists of /usr/share/vim
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Jozsef wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Jozsef wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Javier Ramos Hidalgo wrote:
> >
> > > 2009/9/21 Jozsef
> > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > > Before upgrading to vim 7.2.245-1 I removed vi, gvim and vim with
> > > > pacman -R
> > > > then I installed only
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Jozsef wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Javier Ramos Hidalgo wrote:
>
> > 2009/9/21 Jozsef
> >
> > > Hi.
> > > Before upgrading to vim 7.2.245-1 I removed vi, gvim and vim with pacman
> > > -R
> > > then I installed only vim 7.2.245-1 and I see my scripts and plugins for
> >
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Javier Ramos Hidalgo wrote:
> 2009/9/21 Jozsef
>
> > Hi.
> > Before upgrading to vim 7.2.245-1 I removed vi, gvim and vim with pacman -R
> > then I installed only vim 7.2.245-1 and I see my scripts and plugins for
> > autocompition, buffers on top of window... are not workin
2009/9/21 Jozsef
> Hi.
> Before upgrading to vim 7.2.245-1 I removed vi, gvim and vim with pacman -R
> then I installed only vim 7.2.245-1 and I see my scripts and plugins for
> autocompition, buffers on top of window... are not working anymore.
> Anybody had some similar experience?
> Is there a
22 matches
Mail list logo
