Hi
bump to latest version.
Please signoff both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi
bump to latest version.
Please signoff both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
kurrata wrote:
On 02/11/10 19:47, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
See this guys - http://dpaste.com/157512/
All of you're facing the same ? If not, what's the fix ?
After some fighting i did thi "pacman -S qt kdelibs phonon"
After that installed i could start to upgrade rest of the system...i
hope
Am Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:23:36 +0100
schrieb John Black :
> 64bit support for proprietary software, on Linux, is disgustingly bad.
What about asking those developers of proprietary software to release
x86_64 builds, too?
If nobody complains, they won't never change anything.
Greetings,
Heiko
On 02/20/2010 04:23 AM, John Black wrote:
>
> 64bit support for proprietary software, on Linux, is disgustingly bad.
>
Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
bit programs..
On 2/19/10, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 19.02.2010 16:40, schrieb Ray Kohler:
>> Add the "resume" hook to the end of the HOOKS list in
>> /etc/mkinitcpio.conf and rebuild your initramfs. This has to be added
>> manually now with the non-klibc mkinitcpio.
>
> Actually, all documentation I knew of al
Am Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:25:11 -0700
schrieb Brendan Long :
> Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
> bit programs..
No, it can't. This is only possible with multilib (lib32-*) support. So
you need to install every library twice to be able to run 32 bit
software.
Gr
Am Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:25:11 -0700
schrieb Brendan Long :
> Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
> bit programs..
Btw., I don't see any good reasons why developers of proprietary
software couldn't build x86_64 packages. They should only need to
compile their softw
On 02/20/2010 04:03 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:25:11 -0700
> schrieb Brendan Long :
>
>
>> Why not just install the 32 bit version then? 64 bit Linux can run 32
>> bit programs..
>>
> No, it can't. This is only possible with multilib (lib32-*) support. So
> you need to
Hello all,
Trying to translate some of the entries in
/etc/X11/xdm/archlinux/Xresources
to Italian I get strange results.
Xlogin*greeting:Benvenuti to Salome
works OK. But
Xlogin*namePrompt:Nome d'utente\040:
Xlogin*passwdPrompt:Parola d'ordine\040:
just give me the defaults.
I trie
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:07 PM, gt wrote:
> Guys, if any of you are subscribed to planet arch, then you must have
> noticed a problem with some of the feeds.
>
> The problem is, the summary of the feed displays fine, but when i open the
> feed, it shows the xml of the feed instead of showing the
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
> Can you please clarify what you mean by "opened the feed"? The feeds
> items you describe *do* link to planet.archlinux.org and not the
> feed's parent. This may be a bug in those feeds (both are wordpress)
> or it may be a bug in planet. I
On 21/02/10 11:39, gt wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Aaron Griffinwrote:
Can you please clarify what you mean by "opened the feed"? The feeds
items you describe *do* link to planet.archlinux.org and not the
feed's parent. This may be a bug in those feeds (both are wordpress)
or it may
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> This is nothing to do with the atom feed specifically. Go to the main
> planet page and click on the links for articles from Godane or Arch Haskell.
> They do not link through to the blog they came from.
>
>
Yes, they simply show the websi
On Sunday 21 February 2010 04:35:51 Heiko Baums wrote:
> Btw., I don't see any good reasons why developers of proprietary
> software couldn't build x86_64 packages. They should only need to
> compile their software a second time.
Assuming the software is 64 bit clean. Thats a lot to assume!
--
Re
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 21/02/10 11:39, gt wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Aaron
>> Griffinwrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you please clarify what you mean by "opened the feed"? The feeds
>>> items you describe *do* link to planet.archlinux.org and not the
>>>
Hi guys, this has been known for a while, that init shows as ini.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15362
Now that we have ditched klibc, can this bug be fixed now?
Hi,
I've two problems with ifplugd and net-auto-wired. When ifplugd is
started during boot my speakers make a weird and very loud "moep"
sound. When started from a console after boot no such sound occurs.
The second problem I have is if net-auto-wired starts during boot
time it will not detect an
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:57:36 +0100, Sebastian Köhler
wrote:
> I've two problems with ifplugd and net-auto-wired. When ifplugd is
> started during boot my speakers make a weird and very loud "moep"
> sound. When started from a console after boot no such sound occurs.
Intel and via sound chips hav
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:57:36AM +0100, Sebastian Köhler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've two problems with ifplugd and net-auto-wired. When ifplugd is
> started during boot my speakers make a weird and very loud "moep"
> sound. When started from a console after boot no such sound occurs.
>
> The second p
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 06:04:24AM +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Intel and via sound chips have a tendency to make noise in some
> conditions like acpi wakeup, or sudden power drop in weak laptops.
> Try to blacklist your sound driver and load it after whatever causes the
> noise.
> Never read ab
21 matches
Mail list logo
