Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Switching the bugtracker to Bugzilla

2017-11-21 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Jelle van der Waa > Sent: Tue Nov 21 10:36:08 CET 2017 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Switching the bugtracker to > Bugzilla > > > I'm quiet happy that we are still running everything on our (community > sponsored) infrastructu

Re: [arch-general] Kernel source URL change

2018-08-08 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
On August 8, 2018 4:54 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote: > Em agosto 7, 2018 23:31 W B via arch-general escreveu: > > > It isn't an order. > > > > > Can you tell us why this change was required, please? > > Have you read the original post to the list? Specially this [0]? > The

Re: [arch-general] Kernel source URL change

2018-08-08 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Jonathon Fernyhough > Sent: Wed Aug 08 18:09:30 CEST 2018 > To: > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Kernel source URL change > > > On 08/08/18 12:43, Geo Kozey via arch-general wrote: > > This can impose security risks on Arch as we now have to > > tru

Re: [arch-general] i3stats depends on wireless_tools, causing "firmware load for regulatory.db failed" w/o wireless-regdb

2018-08-12 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Dave M. via arch-general > Sent: Sun Aug 12 20:37:03 CEST 2018 > To: > Cc: Dave M. > Subject: Re: [arch-general] i3stats depends on wireless_tools, causing > "firmware load for regulatory.db failed" w/o wireless-regdb > > > > On 8/12/18 2:54 PM, Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wro

Re: [arch-general] i3stats depends on wireless_tools, causing "firmware load for regulatory.db failed" w/o wireless-regdb

2018-08-16 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: David C. Rankin > Sent: Thu Aug 16 02:16:40 CEST 2018 > To: Geo Kozey via arch-general > Subject: Re: [arch-general] i3stats depends on wireless_tools, causing > "firmware load for regulatory.db failed" w/o wireless-regdb > > > On 08/12/2018 04:38 PM

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-09 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Leonid Isaev via arch-general > Sent: Sun Sep 09 22:00:03 CEST 2018 > To: > Cc: Leonid Isaev > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > FWIW, I actually agree with #59733: CONFIG_AUDIT=n was blocking AppArmor > adoption... Perhaps re

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-09 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: David Runge > Sent: Sun Sep 09 22:19:37 CEST 2018 > To: , General Discussion about Arch Linux > , Leonid Isaev via arch-general > , > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > FYI, > I'm currently working on bringing the user space too

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-10 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Levente Polyak via arch-general > Sent: Mon Sep 10 14:09:06 CEST 2018 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Cc: Levente Polyak > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > Nice to hear that you do or at least did, bear with me fo

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-10 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Levente Polyak > Sent: Mon Sep 10 18:42:14 CEST 2018 > To: Geo Kozey > Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > I think you are totally missing the point, everyone can happily debug, > bisect an

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-10 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Carsten Mattner > Sent: Mon Sep 10 20:07:23 CEST 2018 > To: Geo Kozey , General Discussion about Arch Linux > > Cc: Levente Polyak > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > On 9/10/18, Geo Kozey via

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-13 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: David Runge > Sent: Thu Sep 13 19:51:49 CEST 2018 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > It is now in [community-testing]. Feel free to comment and suggest > improvements! > > Best, > David

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-14 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: David Runge > Sent: Fri Sep 14 11:24:09 CEST 2018 > To: Geo Kozey > Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > On 2018-09-13 20:52:23 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > > > ---

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-20 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: David Runge > Sent: Thu Sep 20 20:42:08 CEST 2018 > To: Geo Kozey > Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > On 2018-09-14 12:21:26 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > > They called it 'binmerge' :)

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-22 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: David Runge > Sent: Fri Sep 21 20:41:15 CEST 2018 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > On 2018-09-21 10:53:33 (+), Gus wrote: > > Have been running it for a few days, so far everythi

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-22 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: David Runge > Sent: Sat Sep 22 17:43:51 CEST 2018 > To: Geo Kozey > Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > Hi Geo, > > On 2018-09-22 15:13:20 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > > After [0] sed ru

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-22 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Geo Kozey via arch-general > Sent: Sat Sep 22 18:23:58 CEST 2018 > To: David Runge > Cc: Geo Kozey , General Discussion about Arch Linux > > Subject: Re: [arch-gene

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-23 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: David Runge > Sent: Sat Sep 22 21:43:20 CEST 2018 > To: Geo Kozey > Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > On 2018-09-22 18:38:14 (+0200), Geo Kozey wrote: > > > It's almost there ;) > > >

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

2018-09-28 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: David Runge > Sent: Thu Sep 27 23:49:16 CEST 2018 > To: Geo Kozey > Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support > > > BTW: every interaction with PKGBUILD spits: > > > > find: ‘etc/apparmor.d/’: No s

Re: [arch-general] new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod

2019-10-31 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general > Sent: Thu Oct 31 14:55:47 CET 2019 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Cc: Giancarlo Razzolini > Subject: Re: [arch-general] new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod > > Hi Damjan, > > The kern

Re: [arch-general] new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod

2019-10-31 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Eli Schwartz via arch-general > Sent: Thu Oct 31 20:16:18 CET 2019 > To: > Cc: Eli Schwartz > Subject: Re: [arch-general] new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod > > > On 10/31/19 2:11 PM, Geo Kozey via arch-

Re: [arch-general] new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod

2019-10-31 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Giancarlo Razzolini > Sent: Thu Oct 31 19:30:42 CET 2019 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux , Geo > Kozey > Subject: Re: [arch-general] new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod > > There are several reasons for not using it. It's over

Re: [arch-general] new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod

2019-11-02 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Eli Schwartz via arch-general > Sent: Fri Nov 01 23:06:03 CET 2019 > To: > Cc: Eli Schwartz > Subject: Re: [arch-general] new packaging of the kernel/mkinitcpio/kmod > > > Dracut does not work out of the box (we currently patch it to not use a

Re: [arch-general] Fedora Speeds Up Python 3.

2019-11-26 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Ralph Corderoy > Sent: Tue Nov 26 11:07:36 CET 2019 > To: > Subject: [arch-general] Fedora Speeds Up Python 3. > > > Hi, > > I thought this might be of interest. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonNoSemanticInterpositionSpeedup > > By building with -fno-semantic-interposit

Re: [arch-general] Zstandard for local user build packages - Was: [arch-announce] Now using Zstandard instead of xz for package compression

2020-01-06 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Morten Linderud via arch-general > Sent: Sat Jan 04 23:46:26 CET 2020 > To: > Cc: Morten Linderud > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Zstandard for local user build packages - Was: > [arch-announce] Now using Zstandard instead of xz for package compr

Re: [arch-general] systemd-zram generator

2020-01-13 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Chris Murphy > Sent: Mon Jan 13 05:51:15 CET 2020 > To: > Subject: [arch-general] systemd-zram generator > > > Hi, > > swap-create@.service generator for zram devices > https://github.com/systemd/zram-generator > > zram: Compressed RAM based block devices > https://www.kernel.org/doc/

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Potential removal of Chromium in ~2 months

2020-02-23 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 5:50 AM, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote: > Just a quick heads up that I am considering dropping Chromium from > [extra] a week or two before the Chromium 82 stable release (~April 28). > The reason for this is that our API keys no longer work for geolo

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 2/2] makepkg.conf: Update our default FLAGS

2020-07-11 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
On Friday, July 10, 2020 7:06 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 7/10/20 2:38 PM, Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) via arch-dev-public > wrote: > > > From: "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)" hef...@archlinux.org > > I recently read Fedora's documentation on build flags and I think >

Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78

2020-08-15 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Franck STAUFFER > Sent: Sat Aug 15 09:32:51 CEST 2020 > To: karx via arch-general > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78 > > > Shouldn't it be the opposite? > This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people > want

Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78

2020-10-27 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Bjoern Franke via arch-general > Sent: Tue Oct 27 14:35:38 CET 2020 > To: > Cc: Bjoern Franke > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78 > > I've switched now to 78.4.0 (from AUR) and it seems at lot of bugs of > the first 78.x releases are gone. > > And even Ubuntu ships 78.x now, s

Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78

2020-10-28 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Maarten de Vries via arch-general > Sent: Wed Oct 28 12:20:45 CET 2020 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Cc: Maarten de Vries > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78 > > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 23:26, Bjoern Franke via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:

Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78

2020-10-29 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Kevin Morris > Sent: Thu Oct 29 00:28:04 CET 2020 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78 > > > Could you guys reference the security patches that Arch is > critically missing out on by delaying this update? I've noticed > a couple of you s

Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78

2020-10-29 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> From: Morten Linderud via arch-general > Sent: Thu Oct 29 13:57:35 CET 2020 > To: > Cc: Morten Linderud > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78 > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Geo Kozey via arch-general wrote: > > > From: Kevin Mor