[arch-general] Relicencing Wiki Content under Creative Commons

2021-02-22 Thread alpabrz--- via arch-general
Greeting Archers, I would like to reuse and expand a Template from the ArchWiki for another Wiki. For that it would be ideal to relicence the content from GFDL 1.3 to CC BY-SA 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike). This page [1] states that GDFL v1.3 was explicitly designed to make

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Moving to Zstandard images by default on mkinitcpio

2021-02-22 Thread Geo Kozey via arch-general
> > From: Kevin Morris via arch-general > Sent: Mon Feb 22 02:12:20 CET 2021 > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux > Cc: Kevin Morris > Subject: Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Moving to Zstandard images by > default on mkinitcpio > > > A 10

Re: [arch-general] pacmatic. Was: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

2021-02-22 Thread u34--- via arch-general
Ben Oliver via arch-general wrote: > On 2021-02-22 13:58:36, Anton Hvornum via arch-general wrote: > >That would answer my issue yesterday, but raises another question. > > > >What dictates if something is worthy of being put on the bulletin > >board on the main website? > > > >I added 2FA way

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Moving to Zstandard images by default on mkinitcpio

2021-02-22 Thread Archange via arch-general
Le 22/02/2021 à 05:12, Kevin Morris via arch-general a écrit : A 10 second improvement is _large_. You may think that you don't need it because you're sitting at your computer, but think about servers, vms, automated systems... Every second makes things quicker. Moving from 20 seconds to 10

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Moving to Zstandard images by default on mkinitcpio

2021-02-22 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general
Em fevereiro 22, 2021 10:53 Damjan Georgievski via arch-general escreveu: Em fevereiro 22, 2021 10:23 JustKidding via arch-general escreveu: > Do I have to wait for kernel 5.11 in order to use zstd? > No, zstd is supported since kernel 5.9. The unfortunate consequence of this is that

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Moving to Zstandard images by default on mkinitcpio

2021-02-22 Thread Damjan Georgievski via arch-general
> Em fevereiro 22, 2021 10:23 JustKidding via arch-general escreveu: > > Do I have to wait for kernel 5.11 in order to use zstd? > > > > No, zstd is supported since kernel 5.9. The unfortunate consequence of this is that currently Arch only has 5.10 kernels available, and a mkinitcpio that by

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Moving to Zstandard images by default on mkinitcpio

2021-02-22 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general
Em fevereiro 22, 2021 10:23 JustKidding via arch-general escreveu: Do I have to wait for kernel 5.11 in order to use zstd? No, zstd is supported since kernel 5.9. pgpgH7moXo2re.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Moving to Zstandard images by default on mkinitcpio

2021-02-22 Thread JustKidding via arch-general
Do I have to wait for kernel 5.11 in order to use zstd? On 2/19/21 2:13 PM, Piscium via arch-general wrote: On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 13:37, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-announce wrote: As linux-lts moved to the 5.10 version, all official kernels of Arch Linux

Re: [arch-general] PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

2021-02-22 Thread Ben Oliver via arch-general
On 2021-02-22 13:58:36, Anton Hvornum via arch-general wrote: That would answer my issue yesterday, but raises another question. What dictates if something is worthy of being put on the bulletin board on the main website? I added 2FA way back when to /etc/pam.d/system-login and that meant that

Re: [arch-general] PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

2021-02-22 Thread Doug Newgard via arch-general
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:36 +0100 Anton Hvornum via arch-general wrote: > What dictates if something is worthy of being put on the bulletin > board on the main website? Something out of the ordinary. Merging .pacnew files is a normal, standard part of system updates.

Re: [arch-general] PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

2021-02-22 Thread Anton Hvornum via arch-general
That would answer my issue yesterday, but raises another question. What dictates if something is worthy of being put on the bulletin board on the main website? I added 2FA way back when to /etc/pam.d/system-login and that meant that pacman placed a .pacnew file alongside the modified

Re: [arch-general] PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

2021-02-22 Thread Björn Fries via arch-general
> I can't remember if I've > added the following to /etc/pam.d/system-login or not: > > auth required pam_tally2.soonerr=succeed file=/var/log/tallylog The line was changed by https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/commit/7afa3fb3a9e74c27f4c2af85c8ff624123c830e1 to

[arch-general] PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

2021-02-22 Thread Anton Hvornum via arch-general
Hi. This might be suited for the newbie corner, but I'm testing my luck with the mailing list for the first time. I can't remember if I've added the following to /etc/pam.d/system-login or not: auth required pam_tally2.soonerr=succeed file=/var/log/tallylog The reason why I'm