PS:
Still no sound:
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ beep -l300 -f750 --verbose --debug
beep: Verbose: evdev: driver_detect 0x562c898210c0 (nil)
beep: Verbose: lib: could not open(2)
/dev/input/by-path/platform-pcspkr-event-spkr: Permission denied
beep: Verbose: console: driver_detect 0x562c89820e60
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 06:25 +0200, mpan wrote:
> For testing purposes instal the beep package and run `beep` from it.
Hi,
neither running beep as user, nor as root does produce audible sound.
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ beep
beep: Error: Could not open any device
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ echo
if I turn on the computer, the PC buzzer does beep one time, so it does
work for the POST, but the terminal (ROXTerm, with audible bell enabled)
is silent, it doesn't beep anymore after using the Arch install from my
old PC with my new PC. […]
For testing purposes instal the beep package and
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:54:19PM +0200, Óscar García Amor wrote:
> > Scanning the available docs, I found out that systemd-networkd
> > is enabled by default. Could this be in conflict with netctl ?
>
> Yes, in fact, I advise you NOT to use netctl and to use systemd-
> netword[1] directly.
Hi,
if I turn on the computer, the PC buzzer does beep one time, so it does
work for the POST, but the terminal (ROXTerm, with audible bell enabled)
is silent, it doesn't beep anymore after using the Arch install from my
old PC with my new PC.
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ lsmod | grep pcspkr
El mar, 28-03-2023 a las 18:09 +0200, Fons Adriaensen escribió:
> Scanning the available docs, I found out that systemd-networkd
> is enabled by default. Could this be in conflict with netctl ?
Yes, in fact, I advise you NOT to use netctl and to use systemd-
netword[1] directly.
Another option
Hi Ralph,
> Unless the remote hands are used to precisely editing configuration
> files, this might be something where a mistake has been made.
We verified the dhcp file, and I'm pretty sure it's okay.
My friend may be a linux noob, but he's an experienced engineer
and learling fast :-) It's
Hi FA,
I've some general ideas. Others will have better comments on your
particular questions.
> Also the ethernet-dhcp example is copied to /etc/netctl/dhcp and
> edited for the correct interface (enp0s25).
Unless the remote hands are used to precisely editing configuration
files, this might
Hello all,
Yesterday I assisted (via a text chat) a linux noob to install
Archlinux on a laptop.
We got so far that the system can boot on its own, and we can
login as root.
The netctl package is installed. Also the ethernet-dhcp example
is copied to /etc/netctl/dhcp and edited for the correct
Le mar. 28 mars 2023 à 16:34, lacsaP Patatetom a écrit :
>
> hi,
>
> when you add the `break` parameter to the list of parameters passed
> when the system boots, you find yourself in an interactive shell that
> allows you to issue commands, perform tests, and so on...
>
> the shell is apparently
hi,
when you add the `break` parameter to the list of parameters passed
when the system boots, you find yourself in an interactive shell that
allows you to issue commands, perform tests, and so on...
the shell is apparently provided by `ash`.
how to have a colored prompt (which visually helps
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023, Lone_Wolf wrote:
On 28-03-2023 14:42, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi LW,
If I wanted to duplicate the packages from one machine to another
then I'd like the method to not alter the source machine, preserve
my choices, and that some packages weren't explicitly wanted.
In
Hi LW,
> A possible workaround could be to identify the virtual provides and
> choose a sensible provider for them.
>
> Those sensible choices would be entered in a set F that will be
> installed with --asdeps BEFORE set E.
Ah, that's given me an idea.
On machine A, I could ‘pacman -Qqd’ to get
On 28-03-2023 14:42, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi LW,
If I wanted to duplicate the packages from one machine to another
then I'd like the method to not alter the source machine, preserve
my choices, and that some packages weren't explicitly wanted.
In other words, duplicate.
...
...could you
Hi LW,
> > If I wanted to duplicate the packages from one machine to another
> > then I'd like the method to not alter the source machine, preserve
> > my choices, and that some packages weren't explicitly wanted.
> > In other words, duplicate.
...
> ...could you explain what you do want to
On 28-03-2023 11:41, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi LW,
Incase you don't want those questions, check which package you prefer
to provide that dependency, change it's install reason to explicit and
regenerate the list.
That seems like a bit of a bodge though. If I wanted to duplicate the
packages
Hi LW,
> Incase you don't want those questions, check which package you prefer
> to provide that dependency, change it's install reason to explicit and
> regenerate the list.
That seems like a bit of a bodge though. If I wanted to duplicate the
packages from one machine to another then I'd like
On 28-03-2023 09:22, Spencer Collyer wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:30:04 +0200, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Am 26.03.23 um 09:25 schrieb David Runge:
On 2023-03-26 07:55:06 (+0100), Spencer Collyer wrote:
I'm installing a new system, and using the instructions at
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:30:04 +0200, Uwe Koloska wrote:
> Am 26.03.23 um 09:25 schrieb David Runge:
> > On 2023-03-26 07:55:06 (+0100), Spencer Collyer wrote:
> >> I'm installing a new system, and using the instructions at
> >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Tips_and_tricks sections
> >>
On 27/3/23 15:30, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Am 26.03.23 um 09:25 schrieb David Runge:
On 2023-03-26 07:55:06 (+0100), Spencer Collyer wrote:
I'm installing a new system, and using the instructions at
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Tips_and_tricks sections 2.5
and 2.6 to get the list of
20 matches
Mail list logo
