Re: [arch-general] About merge for revolt into revolt-desktop

El vie, 27 may 2022 a las 21:21, Morten Linderud via arch-general () escribió: > Yes, I did get the email but I have been busy and simply haven't gotten too > it. > I would appreciate if you gave me more than two days :p Ok. I take note for next time. > [..] > > There isn't a good way to revert

[arch-general] About merge for revolt into revolt-desktop

Hi folks, A few days ago a request was made to merge revolt into revolt-desktop in AUR. At that time I already explained[1] that these were different packages and that the merger did not make sense. Three days ago Morten Linderud finally approved the merger of the packages despite the two being d

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] RFC: Forbid dummy packages from AUR

El jue, 24 mar 2022 a las 12:54, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general () escribió: > > On 24/03/2022 07:39, Óscar García Amor via arch-general wrote: > > But why? > > > > I don't quite understand why this should be banned. > > It's essentially the equiva

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] RFC: Forbid dummy packages from AUR

El jue, 24 mar 2022 a las 8:14, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public () escribió: > > On 24/3/22 11:07, Brett Cornwall via arch-dev-public wrote: > > Summary: Reject AUR packages that fulfill package dependencies without > > providing the files/binaries of the package in question. But why? I don't qui

Re: [arch-general] Donation options

El vie, 11 feb 2022 a las 10:28, Frédéric Tobias Christ via arch-general () escribió: > > Hi [..] fees). > > What do you think about it? > Liberapay uses Stripe or PayPal under the hood, so you are using the same but adding another actor in the middle. IMHO if you want to avoid intermediaries the

Re: [arch-general] NEW RECORD! 769 packages out of date

El mié, 3 nov 2021 a las 9:28, Morten Linderud via arch-general (< arch-general@lists.archlinux.org>) escribió: > https://repology.org/repositories/statistics > > 7909 updated packages, 84.9%, > 1393 outdated packages, 15.0%. > A 15% not is a _small percentage_. IMHO I do not think it is a neglig

Re: [arch-general] rubbish files in krb5

These files refer to hidden configuration files that have these names. If you simply do `man .k5identity` you will understand why they exist. Greetings. El mar, 6 jul 2021 a las 14:19, Yi Zheng via arch-general (< arch-general@lists.archlinux.org>) escribió: > Eli Schwartz: > > Thank you for y

Re: [arch-general] [OT] changing ripped music metadata from freeDB to MusicBrainz

El dom, 13 jun 2021 a las 10:30, Javier via arch-general (< arch-general@lists.archlinux.org>) escribió: > > On 6/13/21 12:40 AM, Magnus Woldrich wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021, 05:44 Javier via arch-general < arch-general@lists.archlinux.org > wrot

Re: [arch-general] definition of "orphan"

El jue, 11 mar 2021 a las 17:40, Elvis Stansvik via arch-general () escribió: > > Yes, "abandoned" is good indeed. Although, I would prefer to have orphan > > packages on my system be called "unneeded" packages. It is much more > > precise in > > my opinion. > > > > I also think, completely irrega

Re: [arch-general] About package guidelines

El dom, 21 feb 2021 a las 17:27, Filipe Laíns () escribió: > What I did look at was the version, which was severely outdated, and the last > update date, which was 3 years ago, so I honestly didn't even bother. Don't worry, I already assumed you wrote the PKGBUILD from scratch in this specific ca

[arch-general] About package guidelines

Hi, When a user submit a package to AUR must follow package guidelines. There is an interesting point that says that in the top of PKGBUILD you must respect the previous contributors [1] and credit them (if any). I'm surprised that this is not respected by the trusted users when they pick an arbi

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux OVH end of support

El lun, 8 feb 2021 a las 13:35, Iyán Méndez Veiga via arch-general () escribió: > You can edit the wiki, why don't you do it directly if you consider it is > relevant for everyone? Shit, I didn't know that I could do it. Thanks! -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux OVH end of support

El lun, 8 feb 2021 a las 10:02, Andy Pieters via arch-general () escribió: > So Arch can still be used on new machines it seems to me > > [1] https://docs.ovh.com/gb/en/dedicated/bringyourownimage/ Yes, but unsupported. This is the same as any provider that permits you upload your own images and c

[arch-general] Arch Linux OVH end of support

Hi, Seems that Arch Linux will be unsupported in OVH [1] maybe a big warning should be added on the wiki [2], especially considering that the contract with OVH is usually signed for one year. Greetings. [1]: https://services.ovhcloud.com/optiext/optiextension.dll?ID=JbaJfV6QoXt4c_KtXH2XHDwz2ydg