On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 12:44:03 +0200
Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> On 23.04.24 18:28, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:49:21 +0200
> > Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> as a Java developer, I sometimes need to do compati
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:49:21 +0200
Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as a Java developer, I sometimes need to do compatibility checking using
> older versions, often using JRE, while I need a JDK for development.
>
> When I tried to update arch linux now, I found I cannot start any update
>
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:01:11 -0400
Pocket wrote:
> I am trying to build nodejs in a chroot using
>
> pkgctl repo clone --protocol=https nodejs
>
> pushd nodejs
>
> makechrootpkg -c -u -r "$CHROOT" -- --skippgpcheck
>
> popd
>
> It fails at this point
>
> ==> Entering fakeroot
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:30:26 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> New features are generally something that can be enabled if wanted, not
> something that is forced on an existing build system. For those building
> packages, they are quite familiar with how to generate a debug package if
> wanted
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 23:04:59 +0100 (CET)
"Abraham S.A.H." wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Probably a little late, but I noticed that `plugins of libblockdev` package
> has been split out to a few individual, smaller packages, as optional
> dependencies. Probably, most of the users already noticed
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:27:28 +0100 (CET)
Brian Allred wrote:
> Actually, I updated again the next day and all was well. But it's funny you
> sent this message this morning, because now I'm experiencing the same issue
> with libvpx after today's update. Discord, Telegram, and xfreerdp all
>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 21:58:59 +
pete wrote:
> Ok
>
> i use ATI Radeongave up on nouveau
>
> Pete
But if you're using the kms hook, you still get nouveau in the fallback
initramfs.
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 07:21:29 -0600
2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com wrote:
> I know that pete said that the question marks in the original post are
> artifacts, but I'm still hung up on the fact that in that original post,
> the filenames appear to be relative rather than absolute, as if some
>
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 12:55:24 +
pete wrote:
> the problem is if you manually go into the directorys the files are there and
> are not zero length
>
> i checked that
And yet both pacman and python say they are not there. What does
`ls -lR /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/gpg/` show?
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 12:22:33 +
pete wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 18:28:00 -0600
> Doug Newgard wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:24:40 +
> > pete wrote:
> >
> > > which gives me this
> > >
> > > "Traceback (most recent call
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:24:40 +
pete wrote:
> which gives me this
>
> "Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/torbrowser-launcher", line 29, in
> import torbrowser_launcher
> File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/torbrowser_launcher/__init__.py",
> line 36, in from
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 21:45:25 +
pete wrote:
> Hi folks .
>
>
> I am still getting plagued by these Python warnings
>
> warning: could not get file information for
> usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyr
> ate_limiter-3.1.0.dist-info/
> ??? warning: could not get
Simplest approach is to simply wait a bit.
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/25
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 15:46:21 +
WinFan3672 wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I was recently performing my system's scheduled maintenance and went to
> upgrade my packages, as you do. When I attempted to do so, this happened:
>
> |$ sudo pacman -Syu
> [sudo] password for winfan3672:
> ::
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 16:28:22 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know where to report this issue, since 2FA for "ralf" at
> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/ fails with "Invalid authentication code"
> [1].
>
> extra/surge-xt-common 1.3.0-1 breaks extra/surge-xt-lv2 1.2.3-2, see
>
>
On Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:51:37 +
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> I am confused.
>
> On the Arch Linux download page https://archlinux.org/download/ , it clearly
> says Current Release 2023.12.01 with Linux Kernel 6.6.3.
Yes, that is the release of the ISO, not of Arch Linux. And it
On Fri, 08 Dec 2023 15:06:58 +
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Subject: Arch Linux release 2023.12.01 comes with Linux Kernel 6.6.3
>
> Good day from Singapore,
>
> After I have downloaded and installed Arch Linux release 2023.12.01, can I
> upgrade the Linux Kernel from 6.6.3 to
On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 20:56:47 -0500
Jude DaShiell wrote:
> The package installs and is not functional. Why it's not functional is
> the package is missing .config/vlc/vlcrc so vlc has no clue how to do
> anything on a linux system.
Assuming you're talking in your home dir, the program has to do
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:40:35 +0100
lacsaP Patatetom wrote:
> # pacstrap -c -C target/etc/pacman.conf -U target/
> pkg/numix-gtk-theme-git-2.6.7.r55.ad4b345-1-any.pkg.tar.zst --overwrite '*'
>
> thank you for this tip from the bowels of pacstrap because this
> option-passing method is not
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 19:12:31 +0200
Christian wrote:
> So my suspicion is that electron was not rebuilt for the new dav1d
> version.
Except it was.
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/electron25/-/commit/c1e450809ccf7cbe0c65d9c997a51ef0a419b600
What version do you have? You
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 22:58:53 +0200
Markus Schaaf wrote:
> Am 04.10.23 um 21:00 schrieb Jude DaShiell:
> > I now have a disk with two partitions on it first one being fat32 esp.
> > The machine is uefi 64 capable. For that reason I can't figure out how to
> > run grub-install on the latest update
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 18:53:07 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> On 8/25/23 18:30, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:49:03 -0500
> > "David C. Rankin" wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> This shouldn't ha
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:49:03 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> All,
>
>This shouldn't happen, but the linux-6.4.11 to linux-6.4.12 broke the dkms
> build of virtualbox 6.1.46 modules. Specifically from the log:
Pretty normal, actually. If you want to run an old version, it's your
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 15:31:21 +0900
"lain." wrote:
> Could you at the very least test it yourself unstead of just assuming
> it will "likely" not work?
> I wouldn't be doing it myself this way if it wouldn't work.
> The only time it won't find libraries is if you don't set your
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:00:37 +0900
"lain." wrote:
> This is how I have set it up:
> /usr/bin = systemwide binaries
> /usr/lib = systemwide libraries
> ~/.local/bin = user binaries
> ~/.local/lib = user libraries
>
> I don't really like to use /usr/local/* on Linux, because it's not as
>
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 21:55:57 +0800
rino1...@gmail.com wrote:
> it's a wireless connection.
>
> using plasma DE.
>
> how do you tell the type or kind of network manager? i remember
> installing "plasma-nm" so that could be it?
>
> the thing is if i disable this networking icon, i lose
On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:27:49 +
Andy Pieters wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my 5.18.10 system and the DKMS build is failing for
> my NVIDIA driver.
>
> To debug it I have tried to compile the driver separately out of DKMS, but
> the issue that keeps coming up with the new kernel
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 20:32:08 -0500
Genes Lists wrote:
> Problem:
> This package is available in community, but pacman cannot find it -
> which breaks pipewire-audio due to missing soname depends.
> pacman only finds 1.3.1-1 which is missing the needed provides.
>
> Cause:
> The reason appears
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:23:55 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> isn't the issue shown below worth a comment on "Latest News" and on
> arch-announce?
No, it's a simple packaging bug. It's worth a bug report.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:45:57 +0300
Greg Minshall wrote:
> hi. after doing this `pacman -Syu base-devel` (and re-booting), a number of
> executables can't find some (out dated?) dynamic libraries.
>
> below are two lists:
> - one shows the affected binaries;
> - the other, just the list of
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 20:16:35 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> On 1/26/23 17:35, Markus Schaaf wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/archlinux/
> >
> > It is either in svntogit-packages or svntogit-community. Find the commit
> > that dropped the package and checkout the predecessor.
>
> I must
On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 17:47:13 +0200
Zero wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Indeed that worked pacman --sync --refresh nodejs
>
> Thank you!
> ~Zero
You need to read the whole message, specifically where they said not to
actually do that. You need to update your entire system.
>
> On 10/27/22 17:41,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:12:35 -0400
Dan Sommers via arch-general wrote:
> On 2022-09-02 at 10:01:15 -0400,
> Dan Sommers via arch-general wrote:
>
> > On 2022-09-02 at 09:41:21 -0400,
> > Dan Sommers via arch-general wrote:
>
> > > [Then I found
On Sat, 14 May 2022 10:55:13 -0400
Matthew Dyer via arch-general wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have 2 machines 1 of wich is x86 and the other is arm based. On On the
> arm machine I am using stormux which is based on arch arm.
>
>
> Here is the issue. On my stormux/arm pi400 machine which btw I
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 19:16:17 +0100
SET via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran into an issue building an application that complained libutil.so was
> not found. It's not in /usr/lib indeed with glibc 2.35-2, while it was a link
> to libutil.so.1 -> libutil-2.32.so in glibc 2.32. Just creating
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 23:29:56 +0200
Uwe Sauter via arch-general wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm hitting update problems with wine. Seems like uninstalling 6.9-1 and
> installing 6.10-1 or advanced usage of "pacman
> -Su --overwrite " is needed.
>
> Pacman shows 4253 conflicting files in a lot of
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:54:37 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote:
> Em abril 16, 2021 13:45 Doug Newgard via arch-general escreveu:
> > On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:28:31 +0200
> > Markus Schaaf via arch-general wrote:
> >
> >> My account exists and I'v
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:28:31 +0200
Markus Schaaf via arch-general wrote:
> My account exists and I've even reset my password, just in case. But
> still can't login. Could someone please have a look at it? E-mail is the
> same I'm posting from and username is the local part.
Is your password
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:37:32 +0200
Friedrich Strohmaier via arch-general wrote:
> Hi Doug, *,
>
> Am 11.04.21 um 16:19 schrieb Doug Newgard via arch-general:
> > On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:16:03 +0200
> > Friedrich Strohmaier via arch-general
> >
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:16:03 +0200
Friedrich Strohmaier via arch-general wrote:
> Hi archers,
>
> after one of the last upgrades aom was upgraded to version 3.0.0 several
> applications stopped working (properly).
>
> I'm not able to play videos in my firefox browser (ok. this one ist from
>
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 18:16:17 +0100
Henry-Joseph Audéoud via arch-general wrote:
> On 09/03/2021 18:01, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
> > This page can show you how up to date various mirrors are:
> >
> > https://archlinux.org/mirrors/status/
> >
> > If you're using one that's
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:36 +0100
Anton Hvornum via arch-general wrote:
> What dictates if something is worthy of being put on the bulletin
> board on the main website?
Something out of the ordinary. Merging .pacnew files is a normal, standard part
of system updates.
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:03:10 +0100
Óscar García Amor via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When a user submit a package to AUR must follow package guidelines.
> There is an interesting point that says that in the top of PKGBUILD
> you must respect the previous contributors [1] and credit them (if
>
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:13:09 +
Piscium via arch-general wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 13:37, Arch Linux: Recent news updates:
> Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-announce
> wrote:
> >
> > As linux-lts moved to the 5.10 version, all official kernels of Arch Linux
> > now support zstd
On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 10:04:46 -0600
Randy DuCharme via arch-general wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Seems the latest linux-ck kernel and DKMS don't play well together. The
> post-install goes something like this:
>
> :: Running post-transaction hooks...
> (1/4) Arming ConditionNeedsUpdate...
> (2/4)
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:58:20 +0100
Nathan Dacunha via arch-general wrote:
> glew-wayland does not provide "glew" and we cannot install glew-wayland
> because all the dependencies on it get uninstalled!
>
> please add this "Provides : [glfw=3.3.2]" on the package glew-wayland thank
Since it's
46 matches
Mail list logo
