Re: Anticipation - Any idea when linux 6.6 will emerge from core-testing? (fwd)

Hi David, not answering your question, but: What speaks against testing with the linux package in core-testing? IIRC, the linux package was one of the packages, that could be up- and down-graded quite independently of all the other packages. regards, Erich On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, David C. Ranki

Re: solving file conflicts

Hi, sry for leaving out the details in the first place. I'll put them in-line: On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Christian Heusel wrote: On 23/10/10 05:28AM, Genes Lists wrote: On 10/10/23 02:41, Erich Eckner wrote: I have two packages, A and B, which both provide the same file X. ... One possib

solving file conflicts

Hi fellow-archers, I have two packages, A and B, which both provide the same file X. Is there a way to tell pacman to ignore file X in package B, so it is installed (and updated) solely with A? My current ideas are: * repackage B (the official package), so it does not include X anymore -> te

Re: Git migration completed

On Mon, 22 May 2023, Jelle van der Waa wrote: Hi, Hi, On 22/05/2023 17:11, Erich Eckner wrote: 1st: It would have been nice to have some testing setup around, so we could have adapted our scripts beforehand. But maybe, the test repositories were around and I just didn't look

Re: Git migration completed

On Mon, 22 May 2023, Genes Lists wrote: On 5/21/23 07:29, Levente Polyak wrote: We are proud to announce that the migration to Git packaging succeeded! 🥳 A huge thank you for the massive detailed planning and successful execution - very, very much appreciated. Hope you all celebrate lots!

Re: Qwt is currently built with Qt5 - should I mark the package as out-of-date?

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Peyton Murray wrote: Hi all, Hi Peyton, Sorry if this is a naive question, but qwt is currently being built with Qt5, which is nearing end-of-life, while Qt6 has been out for a while. I'd like for qwt to be built with Qt6, but I'm not sure if this means the package is ou

Re: Pacman: There are N providers available for X

Hi, On Tue, 28 Mar 2023, Lone_Wolf wrote: On 28-03-2023 14:42, Ralph Corderoy wrote: Hi LW, If I wanted to duplicate the packages from one machine to another then I'd like the method to not alter the source machine, preserve my choices, and that some packages weren't explicitly wanted. In

Re: Proposal: Do not remove a package from the AUR until it is available in a stable repository

On Fri, 28 Oct 2022, Fabian Bornschein wrote: How is it right now. Are Arch packages build up on AUR packages. For example I release a AUR PKGBUILD with epoch=39, would Arch remove that, reset it to nothing or would Arch keep it? Thats important because if Arch resets it anyways, the PKGBUILD

Re: [arch-general] Updating a (local) repository based on dependency changes

On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Maarten de Vries via arch-general wrote: On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 11:40, Knut Ahlers via arch-general < arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: Hey there, Through the latest update in glibc an issue / question emerged for me and maybe someone on this list has some input fo

Re: [arch-general] hostapd + ap_isolate

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, Uwe Sauter wrote: From my experience, tcpdump connects to the interface and you will see all traffic regardless of firewall settings, given you have the permissions. In your case I'd first verify that layer 2 is working

Re: [arch-general] hostapd + ap_isolate

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, Uwe Sauter via arch-general wrote: Does the following quote, copied from https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Network_Debugging#Tcpdump, relevant? they can only see outbound packets the firewall passes through: [https://su

Re: [arch-general] hostapd + ap_isolate

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 22 Oct 2021, u34--- via arch-general wrote: Erich Eckner via arch-general wrote: Hi fellow-archers, I'm running a software accesspoint with hostapd for several years now. Since some weeks, clients cannot talk to each other dir

[arch-general] hostapd + ap_isolate

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi fellow-archers, I'm running a software accesspoint with hostapd for several years now. Since some weeks, clients cannot talk to each other directly anymore, also IPv6 broke (the latter might be related, but I'm currently trying to solve the f

Re: [arch-general] pacman error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, Jude DaShiell via arch-general wrote: Installation path was archinstall along with some post-install configuration needed to enable accessibility among other things. Successful boot with speech coming up. Then as root pacman

Re: [arch-general] liboping removed ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:43:54 -0400, Olivier Langlois wrote: Bottomline, hopefully the PKGFILE is still available somewhere so that someone can move it in AUR... Hi, Hi, packages drop

Re: [arch-general] when keys aren't updated

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Jude DaShiell via arch-general wrote: Pacman could do with a feature to bypass authors packages and keys so those don't disrupt updates. IMO, ignoring signatures is a severe security issue and should not be done light-

Re: [arch-general] How to cross-pacstrap for other architecture

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Stefan Göbel via arch-general wrote: On 24.04.21 17:41, Uwe Sauter via arch-general wrote: I've tried running 'pacstrap -C pacman.aarch64.conf /mnt base' where pacman.aarch64.conf is extracted from the Arch Linux Arm installa

Re: [arch-general] PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, On Tue, 23 Feb 2021, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote: On 2/22/21 6:58 AM, Anton Hvornum via arch-general wrote: I added 2FA way back when to /etc/pam.d/system-login and that meant that pacman placed a .pacnew file alongside the mo

Re: [arch-general] https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit obsolete?

ich On Sun, 20 Dec 2020, Morten Linderud via arch-general wrote: On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 05:33:05PM +0100, Erich Eckner via arch-general wrote: Hi, Yo! I was surprised to find git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/ and git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/ being no longer updated since

Re: [arch-general] Mounted ext4 filesystem without journal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On Sun, 7 Feb 2021, Alexander Kapshuk via arch-general wrote: I haven't had any replies to the email below so far. Not sure if that's because that email didn't make it through to the mailing list, even though it does show up here