On 22-03-24 13:14, Óscar García Amor via arch-general wrote:
> El jue, 24 mar 2022 a las 12:54, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general
> () escribió:
> >
> > On 24/03/2022 07:39, Óscar García Amor via arch-general wrote:
> > > But why?
> > >
> > > I don't quite understand why this should be banned.
On 22-01-17 15:07, Vasi Vilvoiu via arch-general wrote:
> What is the planned timeline for this migration? IMHO it would do a great
> deal of good to the community to (a) communicate these plans clearly and (b)
> communicate where help is needed and how the community can pitch in.
I'm going to be
On 21-12-05 08:08, TG Servers wrote:
> Thanks that would be great. They compile just fine from upstream so it seems
> there is really only a need to change the source tarballs.
They're now in community-testing due to a couple of changes:
* Bugfix backported from upstream[0].
* New dependency (gra
On 21-12-04 10:17, TG Servers via arch-general wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there any particular reason why these 2 packages are outdated since
> several months, or were they just not maintained?
> I am asking because I would need some of the newer functionality and would
> compile them from source other
On 21-06-28 10:36, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> Upstream issue created: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20050
>
> Does it help to replicate this as an Arch bug?
>
>
> Geert
Yes it does, and it would be appreciated if you did make a bug report.
:)
--
George Rawlinson
Hello Geert,
Can you create a bug report on the bugtracker[0] with as much detail as
possible? If there is already an upstream bug report[1], please include
a link to that in the Arch Linux bug report.
[0]: https://bugs.archlinux.org/
[1]: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues
--
George Rawl
On 21-06-21 18:33, AlexApps via arch-general wrote:
> I emailed both maintainers 10 days ago, reminding them the package has been
> out of date for 184 days, is 9 versions out of date, and has an outdated
> upstream URL.
> I got no response.
> This lack of response, combined with the mentioned lack
