El dom, 21 feb 2021 a las 17:27, Filipe Laíns () escribió:
> What I did look at was the version, which was severely outdated, and the last
> update date, which was 3 years ago, so I honestly didn't even bother.
Don't worry, I already assumed you wrote the PKGBUILD from scratch in
this specific
> I'm surprised that this is not respected by the trusted users when
> they pick an arbitrary package that is maintained in AUR and upload it
> to the community repository without crediting anyone of past
> maintainers. I saw this course of acting in several packages and don't
> like to me. It
On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 17:03 +0100, Óscar García Amor via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When a user submit a package to AUR must follow package guidelines.
> There is an interesting point that says that in the top of PKGBUILD
> you must respect the previous contributors [1] and credit them (if
>
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:03:10 +0100
Óscar García Amor via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When a user submit a package to AUR must follow package guidelines.
> There is an interesting point that says that in the top of PKGBUILD
> you must respect the previous contributors [1] and credit them (if
>
Le 21/02/2021 à 20:03, Óscar García Amor via arch-general a écrit :
Hi,
When a user submit a package to AUR must follow package guidelines.
There is an interesting point that says that in the top of PKGBUILD
you must respect the previous contributors [1] and credit them (if
any).
I'm surprised
Hi,
When a user submit a package to AUR must follow package guidelines.
There is an interesting point that says that in the top of PKGBUILD
you must respect the previous contributors [1] and credit them (if
any).
I'm surprised that this is not respected by the trusted users when
they pick an
