Re: [arch-general] Link libutil.so not in glibc 2.35-2.

2022-02-19 Thread Doug Newgard via arch-general
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 19:16:17 +0100 SET via arch-general wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into an issue building an application that complained libutil.so was > not found. It's not in /usr/lib indeed with glibc 2.35-2, while it was a link > to libutil.so.1 -> libutil-2.32.so in glibc 2.32. Just creating

[arch-general] Link libutil.so not in glibc 2.35-2.

2022-02-19 Thread SET via arch-general
Hi, I ran into an issue building an application that complained libutil.so was not found. It's not in /usr/lib indeed with glibc 2.35-2, while it was a link to libutil.so.1 -> libutil-2.32.so in glibc 2.32. Just creating the link fixed the build issue. I'm wondering if it's a new library