Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

2022-10-01 Thread u34
$ ldd /usr/sbin/remmina | grep libsoup libsoup-2.4.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsoup-2.4.so.1 (0x7fae45bde000) $ pacman -Qi remmina | grep libsoup $ I searched bugs.archlinux.org. Remmina has no bugs there. Is it an archlinux packaging bug? -- u34

Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

2022-10-01 Thread Damjan Georgievski
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 22:12, wrote: > > $ ldd /usr/sbin/remmina | grep libsoup > libsoup-2.4.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsoup-2.4.so.1 (0x7fae45bde000) you should really use readelf -d /usr/sbin/remmina | grep 'Shared library:' instead of ldd but in this case it does confirm the issue

Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

2022-10-01 Thread Mike Yuan
Nope. libsoup is pulled in as a dependency of webkit2gtk, which the latter is a optional dependency of remmina. See https://github.com/FreeRDP/Remmina/blob/master/plugins/www/CMakeLists.txt#L48 On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 22:12, wrote: > > > > $ ldd /usr/sbin/remmina | grep libsoup > >

Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

2022-10-01 Thread u34
Mike Yuan wrote: > Nope. libsoup is pulled in as a dependency of webkit2gtk, which the latter > is a optional dependency of remmina. See > https://github.com/FreeRDP/Remmina/blob/master/plugins/www/CMakeLists.txt#L48 Since webkit2gtk is an optional dependency, pacman will not notice an uninstal

Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

2022-10-01 Thread Yuuta Liang
On 10/1/22 15:16, u...@net9.ga wrote: Mike Yuan wrote: Nope. libsoup is pulled in as a dependency of webkit2gtk, which the latter is a optional dependency of remmina. See https://github.com/FreeRDP/Remmina/blob/master/plugins/www/CMakeLists.txt#L48 Since webkit2gtk is an optional dependency,

Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

2022-10-01 Thread Rafael Fontenelle
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:16 PM Yuuta Liang wrote: > > It seems like remmina -> vte3 -> gtk3 -> libsoup, so it is OK. Could you > double check that? > > Thank you. > > Yuuta Liang > 'pactree gtk3' shows that gtk3 -> tracker3 -> libsoup3. There is no libsoup (v2) in the output of 'pactree remmina'

Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

2022-10-01 Thread u34
Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:16 PM Yuuta Liang wrote: > > > > It seems like remmina -> vte3 -> gtk3 -> libsoup, so it is OK. Could you > > double check that? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Yuuta Liang > > > > 'pactree gtk3' shows that gtk3 -> tracker3 -> libsoup3. There is n

Re: Is the follwoing an arch packaging bug in the remmina package?

2022-10-01 Thread Rafael Fontenelle
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:45 PM wrote: > > Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:16 PM Yuuta Liang wrote: > > > > > > It seems like remmina -> vte3 -> gtk3 -> libsoup, so it is OK. Could you > > > double check that? > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Yuuta Liang > > > > > > >