Re: Qwt is currently built with Qt5 - should I mark the package as out-of-date?

Looks like this should be treated as an upstream qwt issue. Thanks for the input! On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:27 PM Erich Eckner wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Peyton Murray wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Hi Peyton, > > > Sorry if this is a naive question, but qwt is currently being built with > > Qt5,

Re: Qwt is currently built with Qt5 - should I mark the package as out-of-date?

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Peyton Murray wrote: Hi all, Hi Peyton, Sorry if this is a naive question, but qwt is currently being built with Qt5, which is nearing end-of-life, while Qt6 has been out for a while. I'd like for qwt to be built with Qt6, but I'm not sure if this means the package is ou

Re: Qwt is currently built with Qt5 - should I mark the package as out-of-date?

El mié, 29-03-2023 a las 22:32 -0700, Peyton Murray escribió: > Sorry if this is a naive question, but qwt is currently being built > with Qt5, which is nearing end-of-life, while Qt6 has been out for a > while. I'd like for qwt to be built with Qt6, but I'm not sure if > this means the package is

Qwt is currently built with Qt5 - should I mark the package as out-of-date?

Hi all, Sorry if this is a naive question, but qwt is currently being built with Qt5, which is nearing end-of-life , while Qt6 has been out for a while. I'd like for qwt to be built with Qt6, but I'm not sure if this mea