Hi guys,
> http://hpaste.org/41115/hp_for_arch
as far as I can tell, [extra] is only three packages away from providing
haskell-platform. If that could be achieved, i.e. if all required
packages were available individually in binary form, then I prefer that
solution over a conglomerate like the
Do you mean something like this: http://hpaste.org/41115/hp_for_arch
/M
--
Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:43, Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote:
>> Where can I read more about meta packages?
>> How to create them, etc.
>>
>> My naïve assumption was that a meta package was an empty package with
>> dependencies, but apparently that's not the case :-)
>
> Perhaps my terminology was a bit o
Hi guys,
I have updated a bunch of packages on AUR and in the habs repository. We
almost conform to haskell-platform. The only thing missing right now is a
proper version of haskell-parallel. The [extra] tree ships version 3.x, but
the standard says that version 2.2.0.1 ought to be used.
Vesa, ca
Hi guys,
how does http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26279 fit into all this?
Take care
Peter
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 17:50, Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote:
>> The same situation holds for haskell-http and haskell-network at the moment.
>
> These are fixed now, and darcs-2.5 is in extra.
>
>
>> It would be nice to know whether we in the archhaskell team can rely on
>> the HP
>> packages (such as pa
