On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail
> to build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in
> [haskell-extra]. I'm concerned especially about gtk, pandoc and
> wai/warp: they are neede
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:49 PM, wrote:
>> That sounds good, it would however be interesting to find out what
>> your criteria is (what you are looking for) and how your tool
>> satisfies them.
>
> A few things:
>
> - The documentation was so sparse, I thought it would be less effort to
> implem
> That sounds good, it would however be interesting to find out what
> your criteria is (what you are looking for) and how your tool
> satisfies them.
A few things:
- The documentation was so sparse, I thought it would be less effort to
implement from scratch than try to figure out how the curr
On Oct 1, 2012 10:39 PM, "Fabio Riga" wrote:
>
> Hi Magnus,
>
> is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail to
> build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in [haskell-extra].
The only reason is that they require non-obvious patches to build with GHC
7.6.
> I'm c
