On 13/04/15 18:26, Skottish wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 06:37:25AM -0700, Skottish wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:31:12AM +0100, SP wrote:
If you do clear the cache as Nicola suggested and you still have
problems, please also tell us which mirror you are using.
[...]
Just a side note,
On 14 April 2015 at 13:51, SP s...@orbitalfox.com wrote:
On 14/04/15 06:42, Magnus Therning wrote:
On 14 April 2015 at 02:21, Nicola Squartini tens...@gmail.com wrote:
Solving the problem of pandoc and gitit binaries taking so much space, would
require splitting the packages in two. [..]
The
I am for some kind of splitting. See below.
On 14/04/15 06:42, Magnus Therning wrote:
On 14 April 2015 at 02:21, Nicola Squartini tens...@gmail.com wrote:
Solving the problem of pandoc and gitit binaries taking so much space, would
require splitting the packages in two. [..]
The reasons we
Le 14/04/2015 02:20, Nicola Squartini a écrit :
Solving the problem of pandoc and gitit binaries taking so much space,
would require splitting the packages in two. Right now
haskell-pandoc and haskell-gitit are packaged with binaries and
modules inside, and the module part depend on all the
On 14/04/15 13:10, Magnus Therning wrote:
Patches are always welcome. :)
Naturally. If I find time I'll give it a shot.
We don't really have to include the core team at all. ArchHaskell
isn't an official part of Arch so we can do what we want. However,
following the path of least surprise
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Bastien Traverse neit...@esrevart.net
wrote:
Le 14/04/2015 02:20, Nicola Squartini a écrit :
Solving the problem of pandoc and gitit binaries taking so much space,
would require splitting the packages in two. Right now
haskell-pandoc and haskell-gitit are
On 15 April 2015 at 00:56, Leif Warner abimel...@gmail.com wrote:
Do the current packages include the dynamically linkable libs? If the apps
are going to require the installation of the Haskell libs they depend on
anyway, maybe having them dynamically link to the Haskell libs, rather than
On 14 April 2015 at 15:19, Bastien Traverse neit...@esrevart.net wrote:
Le 14/04/2015 02:20, Nicola Squartini a écrit :
Solving the problem of pandoc and gitit binaries taking so much space,
would require splitting the packages in two. Right now
haskell-pandoc and haskell-gitit are packaged
Do the current packages include the dynamically linkable libs? If the apps
are going to require the installation of the Haskell libs they depend on
anyway, maybe having them dynamically link to the Haskell libs, rather than
statically link them in, would save a good chunk of disk space, not to
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 07:36:25AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
If you put it in a ticket it'll be easier for me to remember having a
look at this later on :)
/M
Done.
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
10 matches
Mail list logo
