I'm now removing [haskell-old] since those last packages which
prompted it's creation now have been added to [haskell].
If who's still using [haskell-old] has any problems in moving to
[haskell] I'd like to hear about it on this list.
/M
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Ethan Schoonover
haskell-testing seems to have dropped offline (
http://www.kiwilight.com/haskell/testing/$arch ) around the same time that
haskell-old appeared. Is this because GHC 7.6 is in the main repo now? Or
unrelated events?
Thanks,
Ethan Schoonover
e...@ethanschoonover.com
Disregard previous mail; I'm assuming I just misunderstood the earlier
mail. old must be the former testing. Correct me if I'm offbase otherwise
ignore.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Ethan Schoonover
e...@ethanschoonover.comwrote:
haskell-testing seems to have dropped offline (
As far as I understand it, old is the former haskell, and haskell is the
former testing.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Ethan Schoonover
e...@ethanschoonover.comwrote:
Disregard previous mail; I'm assuming I just misunderstood the earlier
mail. old must be the former testing. Correct me if
Yeah, sorry about that confusion on my part. FWIW I am *really* happy with
the new life in these repos. I am using them with my fire-and-forget
archblocks installer now and I get xmonad up and running with no trouble at
all.
Thanks for all this hard work, Magnus, et al.
Cheers,
Ethan
On Fri,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 08:39:38PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:24:54PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote:
Hi Magnus,
is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail
to build in ghc 7.6 we
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:24:54PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote:
Hi Magnus,
is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail
to build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in
[haskell-extra]. I'm concerned
Alle 20 e 40 del 07/10/12, Magnus Therning si espresse così:
Since I've now added all the packages you list above, except for
pandoc, I'll make the push of GHC 7.6 on Wednesday. I plan to move
[haskell] to [haskell-old] and [haskell-testing] to [haskell]. I'll
keep [haskell-old] around on
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:43:22AM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote:
Alle 20 e 40 del 07/10/12, Magnus Therning si espresse così:
Since I've now added all the packages you list above, except for
pandoc, I'll make the push of GHC 7.6 on Wednesday. I plan to move
[haskell] to [haskell-old] and
On Oct 1, 2012 10:39 PM, Fabio Riga rifa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Magnus,
is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail to
build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in [haskell-extra].
The only reason is that they require non-obvious patches to build with GHC
Hi all,
There's now a testing repo built with GHC 7.6:
[haskell-testing]
Server = http://www.kiwilight.com/haskell/testing/$arch
The following packages are missing compared to [haskell]:
GLUT
anansi
buildwrapper
bytestring-show
cblrepo
ghc-mod
glib
gtk
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 08:52:46PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
Hi all,
There's now a testing repo built with GHC 7.6:
[haskell-testing]
Server = http://www.kiwilight.com/haskell/testing/$arch
The following packages are missing compared to [haskell]:
GLUT
anansi
12 matches
Mail list logo
