Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-12-26 Thread Magnus Therning
I'm now removing [haskell-old] since those last packages which prompted it's creation now have been added to [haskell]. If who's still using [haskell-old] has any problems in moving to [haskell] I'd like to hear about it on this list. /M On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Ethan Schoonover wrote:

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-12 Thread Ethan Schoonover
Yeah, sorry about that confusion on my part. FWIW I am *really* happy with the new life in these repos. I am using them with my fire-and-forget archblocks installer now and I get xmonad up and running with no trouble at all. Thanks for all this hard work, Magnus, et al. Cheers, Ethan On Fri, Oct

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-12 Thread Magnus Therning
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ramana Kumar wrote: > As far as I understand it, old is the former haskell, and haskell is the > former testing. That is completely correct! /M > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Ethan Schoonover > wrote: >> >> Disregard previous mail; I'm assuming I just misu

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-12 Thread Ramana Kumar
As far as I understand it, old is the former haskell, and haskell is the former testing. On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Ethan Schoonover wrote: > Disregard previous mail; I'm assuming I just misunderstood the earlier > mail. old must be the former testing. Correct me if I'm offbase otherwise >

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-12 Thread Ethan Schoonover
Disregard previous mail; I'm assuming I just misunderstood the earlier mail. old must be the former testing. Correct me if I'm offbase otherwise ignore. On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Ethan Schoonover wrote: > haskell-testing seems to have dropped offline ( > http://www.kiwilight.com/haskell/t

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-12 Thread Ethan Schoonover
haskell-testing seems to have dropped offline ( http://www.kiwilight.com/haskell/testing/$arch ) around the same time that haskell-old appeared. Is this because GHC 7.6 is in the main repo now? Or unrelated events? Thanks, Ethan Schoonover e...@ethanschoonover.com http://ethanschoonover.com/solari

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-11 Thread Fabio Riga
2012/10/12 Magnus Therning > > The transition has been made. [haskell-old] will be kept around until > the missing packages are re-added to [haskell]. Thank you for this. I should have some time in the next week to update [haskell-extra]. In the meantime, if somebody (like me) have some package

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-11 Thread Magnus Therning
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 08:39:38PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:24:54PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote: > >>Hi Magnus, > >> > >>is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail > >>to build

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-07 Thread Magnus Therning
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:43:22AM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote: > Alle 20 e 40 del 07/10/12, Magnus Therning si espresse così: > > Since I've now added all the packages you list above, except for > > pandoc, I'll make the push of GHC 7.6 on Wednesday. I plan to move > > [haskell] to [haskell-old] and

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-07 Thread Fabio Riga
Alle 20 e 40 del 07/10/12, Magnus Therning si espresse così: > Since I've now added all the packages you list above, except for > pandoc, I'll make the push of GHC 7.6 on Wednesday. I plan to move > [haskell] to [haskell-old] and [haskell-testing] to [haskell]. I'll > keep [haskell-old] around on

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-07 Thread Magnus Therning
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:24:54PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote: >On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote: >>Hi Magnus, >> >>is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail >>to build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in >>[haskell-extra]. I'm con

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-03 Thread Magnus Therning
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote: > Hi Magnus, > > is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail > to build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in > [haskell-extra]. I'm concerned especially about gtk, pandoc and > wai/warp: they are neede

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-03 Thread Magnus Therning
On Oct 1, 2012 10:39 PM, "Fabio Riga" wrote: > > Hi Magnus, > > is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail to > build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in [haskell-extra]. The only reason is that they require non-obvious patches to build with GHC 7.6. > I'm c

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-10-01 Thread Fabio Riga
Hi Magnus, is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail to build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in [haskell-extra]. I'm concerned especially about gtk, pandoc and wai/warp: they are needed for packages like hakyll, gitit and the yesod suite among others. If t

Re: [arch-haskell] Testing repo with GHC 7.6

2012-09-30 Thread Magnus Therning
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 08:52:46PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote: > Hi all, > > There's now a testing repo built with GHC 7.6: > > [haskell-testing] > Server = http://www.kiwilight.com/haskell/testing/$arch > > The following packages are missing compared to [haskell]: > > GLUT > anansi >