Re: [arch-projects] [devtools] [PATCH 0/9] Changes I've been maintaining in Parabola's fork

2014-05-11 Thread Luke Shumaker
At Sun, 11 May 2014 11:54:55 -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > Modulo the comments I've made in 2 of the patches, this whole set gets > an ACK from me. Thanks for contributing back upstream! What's the process here? Should I resubmit those two patches, or...? Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker

Re: [arch-projects] [devtools] [PATCH 0/9] Changes I've been maintaining in Parabola's fork

2014-05-11 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:22:02PM -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote: > Hi, I maintain Parabola's "fork" of devtools. I've always had a set > of "generic" changes to contribute back upstream, but until now never > got around to pulling them into nice changesets. > > I also had one to allow makechrootpkg

[arch-projects] [devtools] [PATCH 0/9] Changes I've been maintaining in Parabola's fork

2014-05-10 Thread Luke Shumaker
Hi, I maintain Parabola's "fork" of devtools. I've always had a set of "generic" changes to contribute back upstream, but until now never got around to pulling them into nice changesets. I also had one to allow makechrootpkg to handle arguments with spaces, but I just sent that as a reply in anot

[arch-projects] [devtools] [PATCH 0/9] Changes I've been maintaining in Parabola's fork

2014-05-10 Thread Luke Shumaker
Hi, I maintain Parabola's "fork" of devtools. I've always had a set of "generic" changes to contribute back upstream, but until now never got around to pulling them into nice changesets. I also had one to allow makechrootpkg to handle arguments with spaces, but I just sent that as a reply in anot