Re: [Arches] Re: IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS–-A LIST

2016-02-13 Thread Adam Cox
Splendid, thanks for all the info Adam. On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Philippe Laliberté wrote: > Great ! guys. > > The logical answer and the prospective designer tool are the best answers > I could have hoped for! :-) > > You just brought down in half the first rough extentions costs I had.

Re: [Arches] Re: IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS–-A LIST

2016-02-13 Thread Adam Lodge
Adam, In order of your questions asked, the answers are no and yes. The DB only enforces that the graphs contain classes and properties that are loaded to the respective classes and properties tables. We assume, therefore, that if the graphs are intended to be truly CRM-compliant (or compli

Re: [Arches] Re: IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS–-A LIST

2016-02-13 Thread Adam Cox
Hi Adam and Philippe, thanks for the great info. I've looked at the db_data.sql file, and it leads to another question: Where the properties are defined, it looks like two entities are included, presumably as a "source"/"target" pair. Is this enforced anywhere in the database? Also, are the