Hi All
In an APIM multi-tenanted deployment there might be a requirement for the
tenants to customize the store look and feel. We are hoping to support this
by providing tenants to upload custom themes.
Custom themes can be supported in two levels.
1. CSS based customizations.
- In
Hi
According to proposed project architecture on github, we need to move
data-bridge and data-agents to carbon-commons project. When moving these
two to carbon-common project, need to make sure that there is no
dependencies resolving from other projects such as BAM and CEP. Because
most of the
Hi all,
Please find the meeting notes of the $ Subject.
*Participants* : Srinath, Anjana Suho, Sinthuja, Ruchira, Tanya
*Actions*:
- Required fields should be marked with * in the wizard
- Need to indicate that Update interval is in seconds
- Toggling between series of a particular
Hi Subash,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Subash Chaturanga sub...@wso2.com wrote:
HI Janaka,
In a Prod or non Prod env ithere can be a use case that at a given point
of time, governance master needs to refactor the LC config (some config
change as Ajith mentioned) and reflect the
This makes sense to me.
Need to make sure that this CSS customization is sufficient for complete
rebranding including for example company logo, etc.
Dmitry
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All
In an APIM multi-tenanted deployment there might be a
+1 If there any complications please let us know.
Suho
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Anjana Fernando anj...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Yeah, data-bridge and data agents can be moved to the commons project.
Here, in data-bridge, there is a BAM specific module there, called
Hi Dmitry
CSS customizations will be sufficient for the following changes.
1. Change the color theme of the store.
2. Change Company logo on header.
3. Re arrangement of the page layout. ( some what difficult to achieve )
4. Hide unwanted page components.
But it will not help if the customer
Hi All,
As API, App Factory, Mobile etc. stores are having My Applications, My
Devices etc. it would be better to come up with a more generic model which
fits for any of My X items.
Hence, all these stores are based on WSO2 Enterprise Store and, in most of
the real world deployments, a single
Hi,
This is to update the lists that we have decided to drop the Registry-based
DepSync support from Carbon 4.3.0 release onward. We are thinking to keep
SVN-based DepSync for now but it'll be deprecated once the GIT based
DepSync is further stabilized.
Thanks,
KasunG
Yes, This is the correct approach to follow. In the current instance view,
even though we have retry mechanism, user does not have an easy way of
finding out the failed instances unless he looks at the ode db tables. With
this approach, the user will be able to view and retry the instances from
10 matches
Mail list logo