Re: [Architecture] [APIM] Storing configuration for Workflow Executors in Registry

2014-03-05 Thread Sumedha Rubasinghe
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Hi Nuwan, Amila, > > If you for a moment think of a Store/Publisher webapp being a resource > (just a logical assumption), is this kind of workflow similar to a registry > lifecycle? We shouldn't be looking at the configuration model or wh

Re: [Architecture] [APIM] Storing configuration for Workflow Executors in Registry

2014-03-05 Thread Amila De Silva
Hi Senaka, If we assume a subscription being a resource, then the states it would go through are somewhat similar to stages in a LifeCycle. When a subscription is made a workflow will be triggered (the state will be set to Created) and based on the configuration it will call an external service. T

Re: [Architecture] [APIM] Storing configuration for Workflow Executors in Registry

2014-03-05 Thread Senaka Fernando
Hi Nuwan, Amila, If you for a moment think of a Store/Publisher webapp being a resource (just a logical assumption), is this kind of workflow similar to a registry lifecycle? We shouldn't be looking at the configuration model or what it does today, but the functional similarity. I'm asking these

Re: [Architecture] [APIM] Storing configuration for Workflow Executors in Registry

2014-03-05 Thread Nuwan Dias
>From what I understand, a registry lifecycle is always associated to a registry resource (only). But workflows are plug-points to various UI actions that you perform on the Store/Publisher webapps. Ex: A user sign-up, API Subscription, etc. Thanks, NuwanD. On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Senak

Re: [Architecture] [APIM] Storing configuration for Workflow Executors in Registry

2014-03-05 Thread Sanjeewa Malalgoda
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Amila De Silva wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the configuration for Workflow Executors are kept in the > api-manager.xml. Due to this design, there'll be a single workflow > configuration for an entire deployment and all the tenants have to use the > same executors. >

Re: [Architecture] [APIM] Storing configuration for Workflow Executors in Registry

2014-03-05 Thread Senaka Fernando
Hi Amila, How different are these workflow configurations from a registry lifecycle configuration? I'm not suggesting that we reuse, but just to understand. Thanks, Senaka. On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Amila De Silva wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the configuration for Workflow Executors are

[Architecture] [APIM] Storing configuration for Workflow Executors in Registry

2014-03-05 Thread Amila De Silva
Hi, Currently the configuration for Workflow Executors are kept in the api-manager.xml. Due to this design, there'll be a single workflow configuration for an entire deployment and all the tenants have to use the same executors. We are planning to move Workflow Configuration to the registry. A de

Re: [Architecture] Load Balancing WSO2 Admin Services

2014-03-05 Thread Asela Pathberiya
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote: > Hi Asela, > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Asela Pathberiya wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> In some Identity Server deployment, there are clients (web >> applications, Application clients and so on) that talk to admin >> services in Ident

[Architecture] WSO2 Products Tenant Creation Process calls the Reset Password

2014-03-05 Thread Danushka Fernando
Hi all I found that our tenant creation process is calling reset password call inside tenant creation process. When we call tenant creation it goes through *persistTenant* call in *TenantPersistor* class. And it calls *persistTenantInUserStore*. In the end of this call it calls for *updateTenantAdm

Re: [Architecture] Meeting minutes for the review of the Jaggery-Pipe and simpleRouter implementation

2014-03-05 Thread Ruchira Wageesha
Sameera, Thanks a lot for the great work within a short period of time. /Ruchira On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Sameera Medagammaddegedara < samee...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > The updated jaggery-pipe (pipe) and the router implementation is available > at: > > https://github.com/s

Re: [Architecture] Meeting minutes for the review of the Jaggery-Pipe and simpleRouter implementation

2014-03-05 Thread Chan
Hi Sameera, I have done some changes to the router. I'll contribute them back. This is regarding the public api of the router. Cheers~ On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Sameera Medagammaddegedara < samee...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > The updated jaggery-pipe (pipe) and the router impl

Re: [Architecture] Meeting minutes for the review of the Jaggery-Pipe and simpleRouter implementation

2014-03-05 Thread Sameera Medagammaddegedara
Hello Everyone, The updated jaggery-pipe (pipe) and the router implementation is available at: https://github.com/splinter/jaggery-pipe Thank You, Sameera On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Nuwan Bandara wrote: > +1 for the proposal guys. and as chan said if we can use goose for base > stuff l

Re: [Architecture] Load Balancing WSO2 Admin Services

2014-03-05 Thread Sameera Jayasoma
Hi Asela, On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Asela Pathberiya wrote: > Hi All, > > In some Identity Server deployment, there are clients (web > applications, Application clients and so on) that talk to admin > services in Identity server such as user management, entitlement and > s on... To acce