Re: [Architecture] Clarification of Registering a Lean Task Definition

I prefer to make it a configurable option. Since specification does not allow creating task with the same name, lets make it the default behavior. We can give an option from the configuration file to define whether to create a new task. Regards Nandika On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Hasitha

Re: [Architecture] [App Factory] Jira Integration for WSO2 App Factory

Hi Fathima, What did you mean by user's name ? Is it App owner ? If so +1 Just one clarification. Suppose there are 2 tenants A and B. Both have created applications named 'app1'. So will it be shown in jira as two projects with same name ? Or is it visible only within tenant's scope. What if we

Re: [Architecture] [App Factory] Jira Integration for WSO2 App Factory

Hi, Okay, I got it now. So, there is no possibility of having similar named projects in a particular tenant right? If so appending tenant domain to the project name will be the best approach we can take. +1 for that. Thanks. Regards, Dilhasha *M.N.F. Dilhasha* Software Engineering Intern |

Re: [Architecture] [App Factory] Jira Integration for WSO2 App Factory

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Fathima Dilhasha dilha...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Mahesh, Yes, what I meant was App owner. Thanks for pointing out the scenario of having two similar named projects. AFAIK, we can not have projects with same name in a single Jira instance. +1 for Appending the

Re: [Architecture] Clarification of Registering a Lean Task Definition

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Nandika Jayawardana nand...@wso2.com wrote: I prefer to make it a configurable option. Since specification does not allow creating task with the same name, lets make it the default behavior. We can give an option from the configuration file to define whether

Re: [Architecture] Exploded web app deployment for developer studio

Hi all, As per the offline discussion I had with Jasintha, We are taking the approach [1] mentioned in the previous mail. regards Awanthika On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Awanthika Senarath awanth...@wso2.com wrote: Hi all, On proceeding with the task, there are two sub-tasks as: [1]

Re: [Architecture] RFC: RESTFul API for API Manager

Hi Jo, is it possible for you to have a call tomorrow, Wednesday, 4/1, 2pm Colombo time (i.e. 10:30am Germany, daylight-savings-time). I thing a 30...60 minutes will be suffice. Main purpose would be how to proceed :-) I find Skype more reliable than Hangouts. Would you mind about a Skype call?

Re: [Architecture] Generic workflow executor across the platform

Hi Tanya, On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Tanya Madurapperuma ta...@wso2.com wrote: Hi all, We are in the process of implementing the workflow support for ES and came across the $Subject. Although many products have worflow support, seems there is no generic component to achieve this.

Re: [Architecture] RFC: RESTFul API for API Manager

Hi Jo, hi Manu, how to cope with actions that cannot be mapped onto the CRUD methods on individual resources or collection resources is always a matter of discussion and taste when designing REST interfaces. A very often used guideline is to use so-called *controller resources*. I controller

Re: [Architecture] RFC: RESTFul API for API Manager

Hi Frank Yes 2pm is fine for me, my skype is jpfonseka. Will ask Sanjeewa Malalgoda to join as well he was working on the ground work for the implementation. Thanks Regards Jo On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Frank Leymann fr...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Jo, is it possible for you to have a

Re: [Architecture] [App Factory] Jira Integration for WSO2 App Factory

Hi Fathima, I'm -1 in appending suffixes to project name at all the time. Jira is something we are going to expose to users. IMO we should allow them (at least for users with their own jira cloud) to go with what they wanted as the project name. You have to treat this as two separate scenarios.