Re: [Architecture] WSO2 Enterprise Mobility Manager 2.0.1 is released

Hi All, Adding architecture group. Thanks and Regards, Kamidu Sachith Punchihewa *Software Engineer* WSO2, Inc. lean . enterprise . middleware Mobile : +94 (0) 770566749 <%2B94%20%280%29%20773%20451194> Disclaimer: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information

Re: [Architecture] [Pet Project] Velocity Template Mediator for ESB

Hi Asanka, I had a look into the feature set and it looks really useful. Please send us a PR and we will include this in a future ESB release. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Asanka Dissanayake wrote: > Hi All, > I am developing a new Mediator for ESB as a pet project. After

[Architecture] [Pet Project] Velocity Template Mediator for ESB

Hi All, I am developing a new Mediator for ESB as a pet project. After noticing some draw backs in Payload Factory I thought of writing this one. Code can be found at : https://github.com/asanka88/VelocityTemplateMediator @ESB Team: If this make any sense, I am more than happy to contribute this

Re: [Architecture] Fwd: OATH Authenticators for IS

Hi Rajjaz ​, We need to create a common module to improve re usability of the code.​ But this common repo should not be just for ​​ TOTP and HOTP ​, but rather for the entire IS extensions.​ In this common repo ​ TOTP and HOTP ​ should be a component. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Rajjaz

Re: [Architecture] [APIM Analytics][Docs] Documentation space for APIM Analytics

If I understand the scope correctly, tooling should just be described as part of the instructions for performing a particular task. I don't think it will need its own section. Analytics, on the other hand, should be described in topics like "Tracking usage" or other use cases that use analytics.

Re: [Architecture] Fwd: OATH Authenticators for IS

Hi All, Kind reminder on this topic. @Prabath/Johan shall we create a common module for TOTP and HOTP? Algorithm based common module will reduce the codes and we can use for multiple vendors, currently SMSOTP developed based on Nexmo API[1] but there are multiple options available for send SMS.

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [BPS] Rendering information of the current task of a BPMN process instance

Hi, Yes. It is better if we can expose rendering information through rest api. These data will be helpful when integrating bps runtime with process center too. Thanks, Waruna On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Vinod Kavinda wrote: > Hi, > Are we exposing these information via

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [BPS] Rendering information of the current task of a BPMN process instance

Hi, Are we exposing these information via REST api? It's better to expose everything in REST first. Then we can build the UI as relevant, later. Regards, Vinod On Mar 15, 2016 1:14 PM, "Nandika Jayawardana" wrote: > Lets implement this for bpmn explorer as well. However, both

Re: [Architecture] The new disruptor based Netty transport is not working well for MSF4J

Our initial assumptions were wrong and we were able to narrow down this issue to a wrong configuration parameter name. Due to that, we were always running with a single disruptor event handler thread instead of a thread pool. Now we are seeing better perf values with disruptor as opposed to the

Re: [Architecture] [BPS] User management integration of BPMN

Thanks for the update Jayanga. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Jayanga Kaushalya wrote: > Hi Himasha, > > We will be able to finish a JDBC based implementation for Platform with > Authentication, Authorization, basic CRUD operations and claim management > in around 3 weeks.

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [BPS] Rendering information of the current task of a BPMN process instance

Lets implement this for bpmn explorer as well. However, both would change when we move to C5. Regards Nandika On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Vinod Kavinda wrote: > [Adding Architecture@] > Hi DiliniM, > As we are planning on dropping the admin UIs with C5, is there a use of

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [BPS] Rendering information of the current task of a BPMN process instance

[Adding Architecture@] Hi DiliniM, As we are planning on dropping the admin UIs with C5, is there a use of integrating this with admin console UI? Shall we do this in our BPMN explorer UI? Regards, Vinod On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Dilini Mihindra wrote: > Hi all, > > I

Re: [Architecture] [BPS] User management integration of BPMN

Hi Himasha, We will be able to finish a JDBC based implementation for Platform with Authentication, Authorization, basic CRUD operations and claim management in around 3 weeks. We'll update you when we are done. Thanks! *Jayanga Kaushalya* Software Engineer Mobile: +94777860160 WSO2 Inc. |

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] C5 - Enabling SOAP support for BPEL with Apache CXF integration

Hi Amal, Can you show the extension points we use inside the Apache CXF (Bus) box? In addition to the invocation flow, can you also show how you handle the service deployment? Thanks, KasunG On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Amal Gunatilake wrote: > Hi All, > > Following is