On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Dilan Udara Ariyaratne
wrote:
> Hi Azeez,
>
> Even with the pom based approach (as noted by Kishanthan), we do not have
> the luxury of totally getting rid of this file, carbon.product
>
I believe this is only needed at product build time, so we do not need to
k
Hi all,
We are going to implement workflow extensions for APIM.
Following diagram shows the proposed solution.
Your thoughts and suggestions regarding this are highly appreciated.
Regards,
Yasima.
--
http://wso2.com/signatureYasima Dewmini
Software Engineer, WSO2, Inc.
Email: yas...@wso2.com
M
Hi Yasima,
Just one thing, IMO we need to incorporate the complete process if the
workflow is enabled also right? in that case the workflow engine will call
APIM with the status.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Yasima Dewmini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are going to implement workflow extensions
Hi,
Earlier we used BPS as the default workflow engine. What is the default
workflow engine we are going to use with C5 implementation? And There
should be a pluggable point to plug any workflow engine in there.
Thanks,
Lakshman
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Shani Ranasinghe wrote:
> Hi Ya
Hi Yasima,
Don't we need to update database upon workflow completion? Also, Are we
going to write workflow engine from scratch or going to use WSO2 BPS or
Activiti [1]?
Also, this should be extended to other workflows as well?
[1] : https://www.activiti.org/
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Sh
