Hi Janak,
Shouldn't the [POST] claim-verification/validate and [POST]
claim-verification/confirm
be a single step (ex: [POST] claim-verification/verify). If additional
customization is required, it would be just overriding one method.
WDYT?
Best Regards,
Vidura Nanayakkara
On Thu, Feb 14,
he client can start the server with an additional parameter.
WDYT?
Best Regards,
Vidura Nanayakkara
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Jayanga Dissanayake
wrote:
> Hi Ruwan,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> In every server startup, it checks the files list in the
> [product_home]
on-identity-mgt
[2] Architecture mail thread "C5 based permission model for MB-4"
Best Regards,
Vidura Nanayakkara
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Vidura Nanayakkara
> wrote:
>
>
>> Since we are not awar
n bold below:
@Component(name = "some.component.exposing.Authorizer",
*service = Authorizer.**class**,*
immediate = true
)
[1]
https://github.com/wso2/carbon-uuf/blob/master/components/uuf-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/uuf/internal/deployment/OsgiPluginProvider.java
e
)
public class CaasAuthorizer implements Authorizer {
@Override
public boolean hasPermission(User user, Permission permission) {
*// Some logic here.*
}
}
Best Regards,
Vidura Nanayakkara
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Ruwan Abeykoon wrote:
> Hi All,
> >>
>
___
>> Architecture mailing list
>> Architecture@wso2.org
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> With Regards,
>
> *Rasika Perera*
> Senior Software Engineer
> LinkedIn: ht
for providing session managers for UUF apps.
- SessionManager getSessionManager(String appName, Configuration
configuration) throws SessionManagerException;
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Vidura Nanayakkara wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> According to [1], the following points will b
ndler:
>>>> https://github.com/wso2/carbon-uuf/pull/241/files#diff-39f1b
>>>> 4c291c422e721e8c56d191c75e3
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Dilan.
>>>>>
>>>&
T?*
Best Regards,
*Vidura Nanayakkara*
Software Engineer
Email : vidu...@wso2.com
Mobile : +94 (0) 717 919277 <+94%2071%20791%209277>
Web : http://wso2.com
Blog : https://medium.com/@viduran <http://wso2.com/>
LinkedIn : https://lk.linkedin.com/in/vidura-nanaya
ur thoughts / suggestions.
>
> Thanks
> --
>
> *Danesh Kuruppu*
> Senior Software Engineer | WSO2
>
> Email: dan...@wso2.com
> Mobile: +94 (77) 1690552 <+94%2077%20169%200552>
> Web: WSO2 Inc <https://wso2.com/signature>
>
>
>
kshman Udayakantha
wrote:
> Adding these files to parameter section makes no difference because
> parameter section includes implementation specific data. So I think it is
> ok to keep them in parameter section as well. It is up to the
> implementation.
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1
specified as a
relative path, we can locate the files using the relevant configuration
file location (OSGi / non-OSGi) and if we specify the absolute path, we can
locate the file straight away from the specified location.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Vidura Nanayakkara
wrote:
> Hi Niran
If it is not set, then it is in non-OSGi mode.
>>> This is the way we have done for msf4j. Any reason for this new approach?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nira
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Lakshman Udayakantha <
>>
[Adding Imesh and Jayanga]
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Vidura Nanayakkara
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> An example for a secure vault YAML configuration file is as shown below
> according to the current implementation.
>
> secretRepository:
> type: org.wso2.carbon.kernel.s
d Carbon Sec-Vault to 2 Separate
Repositories (Removing from Kernel)
<http://wso2-oxygen-tank.10903.n7.nabble.com/C5-Moving-Carbon-Configuration-and-Carbon-Sec-Vault-to-2-Separate-Repositories-Removing-from-Kernel-td146953.html>
Best Regards,
*Vidura Nanayakkara*
Software Engineer
Email
>>> Software Architect
>>>>> WSO2 Inc: http://wso2.com
>>>>> T: +94 11 214 5345 M: +94 77 374 2057 <+94%2077%20374%202057>
>>>>> W: https://medium.com/@imesh TW: @imesh
>>>>> lean. enterprise. middleware
>>>>>
>
Gunaratne*
>>> Software Architect
>>> WSO2 Inc: http://wso2.com
>>> T: +94 11 214 5345 M: +94 77 374 2057 <+94%2077%20374%202057>
>>> W: https://medium.com/@imesh TW: @imesh
>>> lean. enterprise. middleware
>>>
>>>
>> Regards
Hi Niranjan,
Thanks for pointing this out. +1 for having importFeatureDef to
Carbon-secvault in the carbon config feature.
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Niranjan Karunanandham
wrote:
> Hi Vidura,
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Vidura Nanayakkara
> wrote:
>
>>
?
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Vidura Nanayakkara wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Considering the Carbon Secure Vault's OSGi and Non-OSGi implementations we
> are planning to:
>
>- Get the secure vault YAML configuration from the runtime in the OSGi
>mode: This is be
nfiguration.maven.plugin
> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>
>
> [1] Carbon Kernel Issue
> <https://github.com/wso2/carbon-kernel/issues/1312>
> [2] Carbon Sec-Vault Issue
> <https://github.com/wso2/carbon-secvault/issues/2>
> [3] Carbon Config Issue <https://github.com/wso2
tps://github.com/wso2/carbon-secvault>
[7] Carbon Kernel Repo <https://github.com/wso2/carbon-kernel>
Best Regards,
*Vidura Nanayakkara*
Software Engineer
Email : vidu...@wso2.com
Mobile : +94 (0) 717 919277
Web : http://wso2.com
Blog : https://medium.com/@viduran <http://wso2.com/>
T
dently ?
>>
>> Appreciate your feedback on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Chamalee
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> *Chamalee De Silva*
>> Software Engineer
>> *WS**O2*
o not have the
`@Configuration` annotation?
Should a warning or an exception be thrown when preparing the configuration
file?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Vidura Nanayakkara
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There are few points that are needed to be clarified in this email.
&
e when preparing the
configuration.
Thanks,
Vidura Nanayakkara
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Vidura Nanayakkara
> wrote:
>
>>
>> In order to create the above configuration, I may write any of the
>> b
[Adding Danesh]
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Vidura Nanayakkara
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> *Note:* This email is in reference to the "[Architecture] Carbon C5 - Se
> rver Configuration Model" previously sent to the Architecture mail thread.
>
> I am currently workin
e type when creating the
configuration file to solve the above problems.
- Iterate through inherited classes when creating the configuration
file. This way we can avoid duplicating the same code in multiple places
and help solve the problem stated in (1)
WDYT?
[1] carbon-kernel issu
:35 PM, Bhathiya Jayasekara
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vidura,
>>
>> Can we use ContainerRequestContext and ContainerResponseContext to pass
>> data among filters? And can we use them to access such data at service
>> level as well?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
e same way interceptors
are registered now
[1]
https://dennis-xlc.gitbooks.io/restful-java-with-jax-rs-2-0-2rd-edition/content/en/part1/chapter12/ordering_filters_and_interceptors.html
Best Regards,
*Vidura Nanayakkara*
Software Engineer
Email : vidu...@wso2.com
Mobile : +94 (0) 717 919277
28 matches
Mail list logo
