Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi, Thank you for attending to the meeting and giving your valuable thoughts. According to the discussion we agreed to continue with our design since it is a simpler scenario than above mentioned design in IS 5.1.0. Regards, Yasima. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Harsha Thirimanna

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi NuwanD, C5 workflow implementation for IS not started yet. C4 implementation can be found in following locations, - Core implementation: https://github.com/wso2/carbon-identity-framework/tree/master/components/workflow-mgt - User-management workflow implementation:

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Yes, we will try to see if we can reuse anything. Regarding the points noted down by Darshana, yes, we have the same objectives and the proposed design achieves all of them too. Is the C5 code available somewhere yet? On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Yasima Dewmini wrote: > Hi

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi Darshana, Thank you for your input. I will look into above approach and try to figure out whether we can use same approach. Regards, Yasima. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Darshana Gunawardana wrote: > Hi Yasima\NuwanD, > > With IS 5.1.0 it was implemented generic

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi Nuwan, It will be great if you guys can evaluate this and see if anything can be reused from it. IS 6.0.0 will also be re-using this implementation on top of C5. Harsha is the one who implemented it for IS 5.1.0. You can talk with him to get an idea. Regards, Johann. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi Yasima\NuwanD, With IS 5.1.0 it was implemented generic workflow design[1] that can be used in any product. (Quoting Prabath) It was designed to to achieve, > 1. Simplicity. Keep simple things simple and have provisions to add more > complex stuff > 2. Not coupled into any implementation. No

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

We should be going with BPMN. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > Hi, > > Have we made a decision whether to use BPEL or BPMN? IMHO better to go > with BPMN, which is simpler. Also, for the default BP engine, we should > consider Camunda as well, and

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi, Have we made a decision whether to use BPEL or BPMN? IMHO better to go with BPMN, which is simpler. Also, for the default BP engine, we should consider Camunda as well, and pick the best one. [1]. https://camunda.org/ On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Yasima Dewmini wrote:

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Malintha Amarasinghe wrote: > Hi Yasima, > > Do we consider workflow related RESTful API implementation as well in this > scope? > We have some things to clarify. I will update you with fully detailed diagram. > > Thanks > > > On Thu, Jan 26,

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi Yasima, Do we consider workflow related RESTful API implementation as well in this scope? Thanks On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Yasima Dewmini wrote: > Hi, > > @Shani, > Thnak you shani for your input. Above diagram shows only the basic idea > how workflow extension

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Though it's available in 2.1.0, it better we keep it open for c5 verification. Hence leaving them open. Sorry for the confusion. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Yasima Dewmini wrote: > Hi, > > @Shani, > Thnak you shani for your input. Above diagram shows only the basic idea >

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi, @Shani, Thnak you shani for your input. Above diagram shows only the basic idea how workflow extension works. I am thinking of adding more detailed diagram of how the workflow requests are processed with workflow engine and how to send the status back to APIM. @Lakshman, With the discussion

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Sewmini Jayaweera wrote: > Hi, > > Since it is the design stage it would be great if we can consider > improvements suggested when testing previous releases too. Please refer to > [1] to find the list of improvements. > > [1].

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi, Since it is the design stage it would be great if we can consider improvements suggested when testing previous releases too. Please refer to [1] to find the list of improvements. [1].

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Lakshman Udayakantha wrote: > Earlier we used BPS as the default workflow engine. What is the default > workflow engine we are going to use with C5 implementation? And There > should be a pluggable point to plug any workflow engine in there.

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi Yasima, Don't we need to update database upon workflow completion? Also, Are we going to write workflow engine from scratch or going to use WSO2 BPS or Activiti [1]? Also, this should be extended to other workflows as well? [1] : https://www.activiti.org/ On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:08 PM,

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi, Earlier we used BPS as the default workflow engine. What is the default workflow engine we are going to use with C5 implementation? And There should be a pluggable point to plug any workflow engine in there. Thanks, Lakshman On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Shani Ranasinghe

Re: [Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi Yasima, Just one thing, IMO we need to incorporate the complete process if the workflow is enabled also right? in that case the workflow engine will call APIM with the status. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Yasima Dewmini wrote: > Hi all, > > We are going to implement

[Architecture] [APIM][C5] Workflow Implementation

Hi all, We are going to implement workflow extensions for APIM. Following diagram shows the proposed solution. Your thoughts and suggestions regarding this are highly appreciated. Regards, Yasima. -- http://wso2.com/signatureYasima Dewmini Software Engineer, WSO2, Inc. Email: yas...@wso2.com