Re: [Architecture] Dropping Registry-based DepSync support from Carbon 4.3.0

2014-02-26 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
Did we not drop registry one sometime ago and again intro it for the sake of simple use cases: not all like/want the need to manage a repo. What is the story for that if we drop this again? Thanks, Samisa... Samisa Abeysinghe Vice President Developer Evangelism WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com On

Re: [Architecture] Dropping Registry-based DepSync support from Carbon 4.3.0

2014-02-25 Thread Sameera Jayasoma
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Sagara Gunathunga wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This is to update the lists that we have decided to drop the >> Registry-based DepSync support from Carbon 4.3.0 release onward. We are >> thinking to keep S

Re: [Architecture] Dropping Registry-based DepSync support from Carbon 4.3.0

2014-02-24 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote: > Hi, > > This is to update the lists that we have decided to drop the > Registry-based DepSync support from Carbon 4.3.0 release onward. We are > thinking to keep SVN-based DepSync for now but it'll be deprecated once the > GIT based DepS

[Architecture] Dropping Registry-based DepSync support from Carbon 4.3.0

2014-02-24 Thread Kasun Gajasinghe
Hi, This is to update the lists that we have decided to drop the Registry-based DepSync support from Carbon 4.3.0 release onward. We are thinking to keep SVN-based DepSync for now but it'll be deprecated once the GIT based DepSync is further stabilized. Thanks, KasunG