Re: [Architecture] Shipping ESB/APIM with enabling connection throttling for Passthrough transport

2016-07-20 Thread Isuru Udana
Hi Sanjeewa, On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda wrote: > +1 for the idea. > @Isuru, Is this count for single client calling services through transport > or total number of connections made at given time? > Total number of connections made at a particular time. > > Thanks, > sa

Re: [Architecture] Shipping ESB/APIM with enabling connection throttling for Passthrough transport

2016-07-20 Thread Sanjeewa Malalgoda
+1 for the idea. @Isuru, Is this count for single client calling services through transport or total number of connections made at given time? Thanks, sanjeewa. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Ruwan Abeykoon wrote: > 4096 (open files) will be taken by jars, class files, logs, other > connectio

Re: [Architecture] Shipping ESB/APIM with enabling connection throttling for Passthrough transport

2016-07-20 Thread Ruwan Abeykoon
4096 (open files) will be taken by jars, class files, logs, other connections etc apart from PT transport. So I would go below that limit on " *max_open_connections" *in transport. Cheers, Ruwan On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Chanaka Fernando wrote: > How about 4096. Even though most linux b

Re: [Architecture] Shipping ESB/APIM with enabling connection throttling for Passthrough transport

2016-07-20 Thread Chanaka Fernando
How about 4096. Even though most linux boxes are having 1024 as the default soft limit, we have recommended to increase that to 4096 in most cases and I have seen several scenarios customers are hitting limits when they have 1024. I feel 4096 is an acceptable value. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:39 P

Re: [Architecture] Shipping ESB/APIM with enabling connection throttling for Passthrough transport

2016-07-20 Thread Ruwan Abeykoon
I would suggest 1024 being conservative. Reason, most linux boxes by default has open file limit (soft) 1024. Cheers, Ruwan On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Nuwan Dias wrote: > +1. Do we have an idea of a sensible default? > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Isuru Udana wrote: > >> Hi All, >>

Re: [Architecture] Shipping ESB/APIM with enabling connection throttling for Passthrough transport

2016-07-20 Thread Nuwan Dias
+1. Do we have an idea of a sensible default? On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Isuru Udana wrote: > Hi All, > > In the Passthrough HTTP transport[1] there is a configuration parameter > called *'max_open_connections'* to control the maximum number of > connections getting established with the cl

[Architecture] Shipping ESB/APIM with enabling connection throttling for Passthrough transport

2016-07-20 Thread Isuru Udana
Hi All, In the Passthrough HTTP transport[1] there is a configuration parameter called *'max_open_connections'* to control the maximum number of connections getting established with the client. Currently we are shipping the product without specifying a default value for that, that means we are al