Re: question about POMs in (new) trunk

2007-05-03 Thread nicolas de loof
I've made some test on minimalist POM hierarchy and having multi-level parents OR setting version using dependencyManagement doesn't break the ability to setup eclipse without having the project installed in local repository.. You can take a look at my poms here : http://ndeloof.free.fr/temp/poms

Re: question about POMs in (new) trunk

2007-05-03 Thread nicolas de loof
I allready use this for my corporate projects with not having this issue : as maven knows the projects are modules from the same parent POM, it resolves such modules dependencies as inter-project dependencies under eclipse and DOESN'T require the project to be installed in local repo. Some prior

Re: question about POMs in (new) trunk

2007-05-03 Thread nicolas de loof
You're right, I missed it. This has a strange side effect : when I run mvn eclipse:eclipse from a fresh checkout, all inter-modules dependencies are unresolved : [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] ---

Re: question about POMs in (new) trunk

2007-05-03 Thread Andrew Williams
I have not looked, but am guessing there is a dependencyManagement section in the parent pom. Andy On 3 May 2007, at 11:45, nicolas de loof wrote: The POMs in the new trunk don't set versions for dependencies on other arhiva modules. Maven has no issue with that when running mvn install. I

Re: question about POMs in (new) trunk

2007-05-03 Thread nicolas de loof
Adding " ${project.version} " on my modules dependencies solves this. What maven hack is used by archiva ??? 2007/5/3, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The POMs in the new trunk don't set versions for dependencies on other arhiva modules. Maven has no issue with that when running mvn inst