The vote has passed with the following results:
5 Binding Votes (Brett, Jesse, John T., Emmanuel, Joakim)
1 Non-binding Vote (Myself)
I'll finalize the release and send an announcement.
Thanks,
Deng
Brett Porter wrote:
+1
The licenses and signatures are all in place, and it appears to be
r
Ok then, to ROME we shall go :)
Thanks,
Deng
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Rome is a good library
Maria Odea Ching a écrit :
Hi All,
I've been looking at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-123 and is
everyone okay with using ROME as suggested in the Jira? I've looked
into it, and at other RSS
+1 from me too.
- Joakim
Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Hi All,
Archiva 1.0-beta-1 is now ready for release.
The highlights of this release are:
- reporting
- repository purge
- fixes in configuration, search and browse
You can access the release notes for Archiva 1.0-beta-1 here:
http://jira.cod
Rome is a good library
Maria Odea Ching a écrit :
Hi All,
I've been looking at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-123 and is
everyone okay with using ROME as suggested in the Jira? I've looked into
it, and at other RSS generators as well (Informa and RSSLibJ), and for
me, it seems to be th
Apache licensed, seems commonly used - go for it :)
On 09/08/2007, at 6:51 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Hi All,
I've been looking at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-123 and is
everyone okay with using ROME as suggested in the Jira? I've looked
into it, and at other RSS generators as we
Hi All,
I've been looking at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-123 and is
everyone okay with using ROME as suggested in the Jira? I've looked into
it, and at other RSS generators as well (Informa and RSSLibJ), and for
me, it seems to be the most promising one.
More info about ROME can be
