Thanks for putting this up James! Your proposal looks great :)
I've also listed below some other things I think we should consider or take
note of while planning the roadmap:
1. When is our target date for the 1.1 release? So that we could cut down
our roadmap and prioritize based on this target
Hi all,
There's always a very important bug in maven 1.0.1 about proxies :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-631
Is there someone who plan to work on it ? for an archiva 1.0.2 ?
cheers,
--
..
Arnaud HERITIER
My managed repository are on another windows Box (for corporate reason)
and are proxied as file:// URLs.
I have to manage them by hand as the DAV server doesn't support windows SMB
file format \\server\path (that gets normalized to \server\path).
That's not an issue for me as there is nothing to
Nicolas,
concerning your maven managed repository: are you currently really doing
that with archiva? It seems indeed interesting, as it simplifies the
configuration of the settings.xml file. However, I have a couple of
questions:
- this means that this maven repository duplicates every artifact
Yes, agreed. +1 for this functionnality, which could, IMO, be implemented
rapidely.
Fabrice
On Feb 5, 2008 8:40 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
I believe what you were pertaining in your scenario is like the repository
grouping? Where in a number of managed
