Yes, let's vote now! :-)
+1 for James
Cheers
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I just vote now? :)
>
> +1
>
>
> On 16/04/2008, at 8:45 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
>
> Now I realize this isn't the normal process, and
+1, everything's fine.
Thx Brett!
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> The Archiva 1.0.2 release candidate has been staged.
>
> This release includes 41 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes
> here:
>
> htt
Nice, +1
:-)
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since we're moving tomorrow anyway, I'd like to propose making the
> following change subsequently:
>
> /archiva
> /archiva-docs
> /archiva-jetty
> /archiva-modules
>
Hey, good news!
:-)
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The board approved the resolution we submitted, so Archiva is now a TLP.
>
> I look forward to working with you all on moving forward with this!
>
> Chee
Nice, I'll try this asap.
Thx!
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought this might be of interest to some people here:
>
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARCHIVA/Setting+up+Archiva+in+Eclipse+with+Q4E
>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think this is a great description for the front page - want to
> update the site? :)
Ok :-)
I reworked it a bit, and updated the xdoc front page on SVN.
Cheers,
Fabrice
>
> For the charter - it is really about a br
scope of responsibility of
> the Apache Archiva PMC; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Archiva PMC:
>
> Fabrice Bellingard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Maria Odea
seconds?
Agree, Deng has done a really good job around Archiva, which makes her an
excellent candidate for the chair of the projet. :-)
Joakim has also been involved a lot, and could therefore also be a good
candidate, IMO.
> 3) Agree on the initial committers and PMC list
>
> I hav
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today, Continuum has graduated to be a top level project and I feel
> Archiva is well on track. What do others think?
+1
Fabrice
On Feb 19, 2008 8:52 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/18, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> +1000 : I was never very confortable with plexus and lack of documentation
> on available components.
Definitely the same. Moving towards Spring will help new comers to get
st
; >
> > This configuration is simple for user but not very clean on server side.
> I
> > can't take advantage of archiva features on my managed repos (even I
> don't
> > need/use them now, they still are interesting).
> >
> > The "v
Nicolas,
concerning your "maven" managed repository: are you currently really doing
that with archiva? It seems indeed interesting, as it simplifies the
configuration of the settings.xml file. However, I have a couple of
questions:
- this means that this "maven" repository duplicates every artifac
+1!
Fabrice
On 1/17/08, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The Archiva 1.0.1 release candidate has been prepared. JPOX was upgraded
> from 1.1.7 to 1.1.9 to fix an issue that results for Archiva to hang.
> Other
> changes for this release include an improvement for m
+1
Fabrice
On Dec 5, 2007 1:58 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> list?
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
Yeahhh, +1 !
Fabrice
On Nov 23, 2007 3:41 PM, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The Archiva 1.0 release candidate has been prepared. Regressions for m1
> proxy requests found in 1.0-beta-4 have been fixed and the important
> documents for the site have been completed
+1!
:-)
Fabrice.
On Nov 9, 2007 11:17 AM, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-4 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - security applied in repository browse and search (only those
> repositories
> where the user has permi
Still +1!
:-)
Fabrice
On 10/30/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Take 2.. :)
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
> - fixes in updatin
Of course +1!
:-)
Fabrice
On 10/22/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
> - fixes in updating of metadata fil
Yes, +1!
Fabrice.
On 9/16/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-2 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - metadata merging (for proxying)
> - fixes in the proxy code
> - separation of managed and remote repository configurat
+1
Fabrice :)
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Archiva currently has a subsection of the Maven user's wiki, which is
> a bit out of place.
>
> I'd like to propose we create two spaces on cwiki.apache.org:
> - ARCHIVADEV - for roadmap/proposals/etc. (edited by develo
Since I'm working on Archiva, I've always been testing it on Tomcat
5.5.23and I've never had a single problem (using the tips provided on
the Wiki:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+on+Tomcat)
I'll look at MRM-323 when I have some time (that is after my coming holidays
:-))
Fabri
I've closed MRM-373 (Unable to delete the pre-configured example network
proxy), which was no longer valid.
Fabrice.
On 8/1/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We (Brett, Joakim and I) have segregated the issues in Jira to prep for
> the upcoming 1.0 release (finally!
Definitely +1 !
:-)
Fabrice.
On 6/24/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Archiva 1.0-alpha-2 was tagged and built on Saturday. The proposed
files, including source and binary distributions, checksums, and
signatures, can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/archiva/1.
Wendy,
even without a whitelist entry of "*", this proxy connector is working for
me...
Fabrice.
On 6/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The proxy connector in the default configuration was apparently
intended to proxy requests from internal to central, but it wasn't
proxying anyth
o JPOX was running on a
1.4 JVM.
Now, everything works fine. Whew!! :-)
Fabrice.
On 6/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It works fine for me. The difference I see is the OS (WinXP and OSX)
Emmanuel
Fabrice Bellingard a écrit :
> Still the same problem running a "
an as well?
I'd suggest upgrading your JDK if it really is _01 - that's pretty
old :)
- Brett
On 20/06/2007, at 8:42 PM, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
> Hi Brett,
>
> I updated my workspace today and tried to build Archiva, and I get
> an error
> during JPOX
Hi Brett,
I updated my workspace today and tried to build Archiva, and I get an error
during JPOX enhancement, in the archiva-model module
(UnsupportedClassVersionError, see at the end of the mail for the log). If I
use the last revision of the Archiva's root POM (that is, with compiler set
to 1.
I got the confirmation mail and answered it, this should be OK now.
Thanks!
Fabrice.
On 6/6/07, Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Fabrice commits are getting moderated, can I subscribe hime directly
> or he has to do it himself ?
Fabrice can do it himself by sendi
+1, I'm happy with it already. :-)
Nicolas, getting artifacts from proxied remote repositories works fine for
me (at least it used to 3 days ago...). If I can help...
Fabrice.
On 6/4/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 as a new clean codebase for enhancements, based on 0.9 featu
Hi,
I've updated my local copy of Archiva this morning and built it, and it
seems that Archiva has problems to load its configuration as I get a "There
are no remote repositories configured yet" when I go to "Administration ->
Repositories" (whereas remote repositories do exist in archiva.xml).
Hi guys,
I started looking at Archiva (on trunk) a few days ago: this looks really
promising, great job! :-)
As I tested it, I started fixing some bugs and coding some stuffs. I've
already put some code in JIRA (MRM-334 and MRM-341).
I'm not sure if the maven permission groups have been collapse
31 matches
Mail list logo
