On 10/06/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that's a planned feature.
Can you explain the planned feature a bit more?
There's occasionally talk of making sure developers use only approved
artifacts in their builds... but that
On 09/06/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On MRM-90 Brett pointed out that Archiva already searches class names
and package names, which I wasn't aware of. (The results page could
use a hint about what qualified each item to be listed. And are the
results ranked?)
see MRM-130 (was m
On 6/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that's a planned feature.
Can you explain the planned feature a bit more?
There's occasionally talk of making sure developers use only approved
artifacts in their builds... but that's always accompanied by a
"sandbox" where unapproved
I think that's a planned feature. It's currently possible only in
terms that any intermediatary can be used to control the content used.
On 10/06/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Archiva home page says:
* Implement controls on the artifacts that the developers in your
organizatio
The Archiva home page says:
* Implement controls on the artifacts that the developers in your
organization use.
What does this mean, and what features in Archiva support it?
--
Wendy
On MRM-90 Brett pointed out that Archiva already searches class names
and package names, which I wasn't aware of. (The results page could
use a hint about what qualified each item to be listed. And are the
results ranked?)
The Search page says 'a variety of data' will be searched... where can
I
