enn State University Libraries
From: "Peterson, Christie"
To: "Archivesspace Users Group"
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:06:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Encoding instances without containers
Here at GW, we are actively in the process of migrating fro
Here at GW, we are actively in the process of migrating from 1.4.3 to 1.5
(i.e., to top containers) and our goal is for non-boxed volumes and
artifacts to be their own top containers, as Adrien and Kate have
suggested. I'm curious if there was some reason why you didn't want to go
that route? Somet
shes,
Adrien
From: archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org
[mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org] On Behalf Of
Bowers, Kate A.
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 8:55 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Encoding instances withou
___
From: archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org
on behalf of Ben
Goldman
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:18 PM
To: Archivesspace Users Group
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Encoding instances without containers
Hi Everyone,
Having just recently upgraded to a post
Goldman
Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2017 9:19 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Encoding instances without containers
Hi Everyone,
Having just recently upgraded to a post 1.5 world, we're learning more about
the top container functionality. One immediate th
Hi Everyone,
Having just recently upgraded to a post 1.5 world, we're learning more about
the top container functionality. One immediate thing we noticed is that we
cannot assign child indicators without creating or linking to a top container
record. Which makes sense. But I'm curious to know
