On Apr 1, 2014, at 10:00 PM, xiaofan yang wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for your reply. So if we do not want to return the address, we can
> have them transferred for sale?
> and ARIN will not treat our 8.2 transfer as the disguise of 8.3 transfer if
> 8.3 transfer come next after the 8.2 t
Hi John,
Thanks for your reply. So if we do not want to return the address, we can
have them transferred for sale?
and ARIN will not treat our 8.2 transfer as the disguise of 8.3 transfer
if 8.3 transfer come next after the 8.2 transfer?
Niki
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:50 AM, John Curran wro
Hi Kevin,
Have you known that one ARIN member who received 23.192.0.0-23.211.255.255
from free pool also strongly supports this anti-language proposal?
meanwhile, they have applied a very large apnic pre-approval (hope) for
transferring their "old" ips into its apnic account.
So, i think it w
On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:34 PM, xiaofan yang
mailto:nikiyan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi John,
We would like to do a 8.2transfer because of our restructure.
However, the transferred ips are underutilized. based on your comments in the
list, it seems that if those ips are lack of utilisation, ARIN wil
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:21 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>
>> > Change for change's sake is rarely for the better. Stability is
>
> Agreed.
>
>>
>> > usually a good thing. I don't see
*Hi John, *
*We would like to do a 8.2transfer because of our restructure. *
*However, the transferred ips are underutilized. based on your comments
in the list, it seems that if those ips are lack of utilisation, ARIN will
ask us to return those ips or ARIN will not approve our transfer ?*
Whether it's no-op or op, please note that an LOA is actually a "Letter of
Agency". Maybe some networks now call it a Letter of Authority, but it's
properly Agency.
David R Huberman
Microsoft Corporation
Senior IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS)
From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bou
It's a no op then. There's no need to mention LOA's at all.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014, Heather Schiller
wrote:
>
> The suggested text restricting LOA is: "ARIN will not issue a Letter of
> Authority (LOA) to route a research prefix unless the allocation is
> properly registered in whois."
>
> T
The suggested text restricting LOA is: "ARIN will not issue a Letter of
Authority (LOA) to route a research prefix unless the allocation is
properly registered in whois."
The text does not specifically restrict ARIN from issuing an LOA
altogether, it requires that the resource be registered in wh
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:21 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> > Change for change's sake is rarely for the better. Stability is
>
Agreed.
> > usually a good thing. I don't see rotating out AC members having a
> > negative impact on ARIN's
John (Springer),
The Governance Committee of the Board has been looking at a variety of broader
issues recently.
As a committee we've been cautious to not let Governance issues monopolize our
limited bandwidth. Many similar organizations can consume themselves in
governance exercises and lose
Cool, thanks for the clarification
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 1, 2014, at 1:35 PM, "Jesse Geddis"
mailto:je...@la-broadband.com>> wrote:
John,
Honestly I shouldn't have bothered responding to his email as it was clearly
just meant to be a diversion. However:
Chris opposes it so it clearly wa
Jesse
Not sure who else you are referring to but Chris is not a sitting AC member.
Thanks
John
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:48 AM, "Jesse Geddis"
mailto:je...@la-broadband.com>> wrote:
Rotflol conspiracy theories abound. Completely ignoring the fact that the two
folks to broache
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Paul Timmins wrote:
> >
> > From: arin-discuss-boun...@arin.net [arin-discuss-boun...@arin.net] on
> behalf of Martin Hannigan [hanni...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:02 PM
> > To: William Herrin
> > Cc: arin
While I want to say I did not appreciate the violence of the original message I
do agree with the sentiment. Let's not make it easy to siphon off ARIN
resources.
Kevin
From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of Bill Darte
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 9
I am out of the office this week and will not be checking email. Please
contact Troy Miller for assistance..
Thank you for contacting me, and have a great day.
___
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, John Curran wrote:
>> On Mar 31, 2014, at 3:11 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:00 AM, John Curran wrote:
NRPM 11 was designed for parties requesting allocations from
Jay,
I appreciate that you have a view to express that is opposed to the Draft
Policy. I understand that you may even be upset about it and that you
believe that the motivation is contrary to the community's interest. But I
think that your personalized attack on the author is unwarranted and
outs
18 matches
Mail list logo
