[arin-ppml] *Grumble* 21 days from ARIN registration to Spam Source..

2014-05-06 Thread Michael Peddemors
Not to point fingers.. just wanted to make a reminder, large hosting providers getting fresh /20's and there is a waiting market to use up all those clean IP(s) for spamming.. not hard to 'justify' their next /20 requirements... I know, not ARIN's job to determine what people want to use the

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-208 Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24

2014-05-06 Thread Michael Peddemors
+1 Support On 14-05-05 06:44 PM, Kevin Blumberg wrote: I'm sending out a revised version of prop-208. Included is an attachment with a redline version to assist. I would appreciate any feedback of support or questions. Thanks, Kevin Blumberg ARIN-prop-208 Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assig

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-208 Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24

2014-05-06 Thread Mike Burns
Or support the change I proposed allowing one small needs-free transfer per year. Two simple clauses solves many of the MAU issues. NRPM tatter-free. Regards, Mike Burns -Original Message- From: William Herrin Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:29 AM To: Kevin Blumberg Cc: arin-ppml@ar

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-208 Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24

2014-05-06 Thread Owen DeLong
On May 5, 2014, at 23:49 , William Herrin wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Kevin Blumberg wrote: >> Do you support the substantive changes in this policy? > > I support Owen's original policy with the minor tweaks to deal with > the couple of things he missed. > > I do not support the