On Jun 23, 2014, at 07:40 , Mike Burns wrote:
> The fact that the distribution both with and without needs basis seems to
> fall along roughly the same lines in terms of block size distribution seems
> to me to say that elimination of needs basis testing has not shown to have
> any meaningful
Andrew,
The destiny of this policy proposal is somewhat influenced by
ARIN-2014-14. If needs testing were eliminated on "Small" transfers
(as defined by ARIN policy), then ARIN-2014-17 may be obsolete. I
continue to support ARIN-2014-17 on the premise that it is much less
controversial than -14 an
Out of curiosity, how many transfers have there been from APNIC to ARIN in the
same time frame? Does anyone besides me want to bet on zero?
Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On
> Behalf Of McTim
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 20
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Steven Ryerse
wrote:
> Milton's conclusion in the research for his article:
>
> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/06/20/baby-steps-and-big-differences-in-address-transfer-market/
>
> indicates that the significant majority of the transfers as a result of the
The fact that the distribution both with and without needs basis seems to
fall along roughly the same lines in terms of block size distribution seems
to me to say that elimination of needs basis testing has not shown to have
any meaningful effect, in fact.
Owen
Hi Owen,
This also means no e
