It seems to me that this proposal actually simplifies things a lot more
than it appears at first glance. Obviously it expands section 8 with a lot
more words. But it does so in order to almost completely remove the
dependencies on section 4 (leaving just a reference to the minimum
allocation size
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Jason Schiller wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Thank you.
>
> The intent was NOT to remove the requirement for in-region recipients of
> transfers to sign an RSA.
>
> My apologies.
>
...
> Option 2 - single bullet for "meet ARIN policy" and "sign RSA" (8.3 as the
> model text)
