Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-10: Minimum IPv6 Assignments

2015-10-07 Thread Owen DeLong
> On Oct 7, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Jason Schiller wrote: > > I'm not sure I follow the impact of the change here. > > Under current policy if an ISP assigns only /48s to each customer, then I > count the number of customer and consider than many /48s as fully utilized. > > Under current policy if

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-8: Reassignment records for IPv4 End-Users

2015-10-07 Thread Martin Hannigan
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:05 PM, John Curran wrote: > On Aug 28, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Gary T. Giesen wrote: > > Not to beat a dead horse, but I think if an org wants to (or is required > to) > > make assignments to entities that don't fit that definition, then they > > should apply for an ISP block

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-10: Minimum IPv6 Assignments

2015-10-07 Thread Jason Schiller
I'm not sure I follow the impact of the change here. Under current policy if an ISP assigns only /48s to each customer, then I count the number of customer and consider than many /48s as fully utilized. Under current policy if an ISP assigns only /56s to each customer, then I count the number of