> On Oct 7, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Jason Schiller wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I follow the impact of the change here.
>
> Under current policy if an ISP assigns only /48s to each customer, then I
> count the number of customer and consider than many /48s as fully utilized.
>
> Under current policy if
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:05 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
> > Not to beat a dead horse, but I think if an org wants to (or is required
> to)
> > make assignments to entities that don't fit that definition, then they
> > should apply for an ISP block
I'm not sure I follow the impact of the change here.
Under current policy if an ISP assigns only /48s to each customer, then I
count the number of customer and consider than many /48s as fully utilized.
Under current policy if an ISP assigns only /56s to each customer, then I
count the number of