Joe,
The asymmetric transfers you mention below are allowed from my understanding.
RIR<->RIR->NIR
I remember this being discussed at the last ARIN meeting. If staff could
confirm my basic diagram that would be appreciated.
I believe at least for LACNIC and AFRNIC there should be a waiver if re
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 08:41 , Mike Burns wrote:
>
> Hi Owen,
>
> May I point out that despite reciprocity with APNIC, almost no addresses
> have flowed from APNIC to ARIN? I think less than a /17 in aggregate since
> the first interregional transfer in 2012.
I’m well aware of this. What I don
Thanks Bill for what looks like support to the one-sided AFRINIC policy.
I agree largely with your observations. Of course, I'd prefer to see a
balanced, reciprocal policy. I did actually have one in but withdrew it
as I'm too busy with my own troubles and didn't have the time to
properly devote.
Hi Bill,
There are very few transfers into one-way recipient NIRs, nothing substantial
that I can find.
Also this type of setup is the opposite of those free trade agreements, it
means American exports and dollars flowing into our region.
I agree the best situation would be for every RIR to allo
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
> May I point out that despite reciprocity with APNIC, almost no addresses
> have flowed from APNIC to ARIN? I think less than a /17 in aggregate since
> the first interregional transfer in 2012.
>
> You are correct in your expectation that actu
Hi Owen,
May I point out that despite reciprocity with APNIC, almost no addresses
have flowed from APNIC to ARIN? I think less than a /17 in aggregate since
the first interregional transfer in 2012.
You are correct in your expectation that actual transfers aren't
symmetrical, because they respon
