Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-7: Retire Obsolete Section 4 From the NRPM

2017-06-21 Thread Austin Murkland
I do not support this policy for the reasons Kevin and Albert outlined. This seems a bit premature. Thanks, Austin Murkland On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:40 PM, ARIN wrote: > On 15 June 2017, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) advanced "ARIN-prop-242: > Retire Obsolete Section 4 From the NRPM" to Draf

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-7: Retire Obsolete Section 4 From the NRPM

2017-06-21 Thread Kirubel Tadesse
Please, Remove me from this list! Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 21, 2017, at 8:13 AM, Kevin Blumberg wrote: > > I do not support this policy. At a minimum, it would remove both the 4.4 > Micro Allocations and 4.10 Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 > Deployment. Both of those sections hav

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-7: Retire Obsolete Section 4 From the NRPM

2017-06-21 Thread hostmaster
I also do not support this policy. As pointed out, there are at least 2 blocks of v4 space reserved and still available for allocation. Also, although returns are not frequent, and the "winners" come from the wait list, these regular allocations (although not very often) happen from time to t

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-7: Retire Obsolete Section 4 From the NRPM

2017-06-21 Thread Kevin Blumberg
I do not support this policy. At a minimum, it would remove both the 4.4 Micro Allocations and 4.10 Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 Deployment. Both of those sections have reserved space and are "active" in Section 4. Thanks, Kevin Blumberg -Original Message- From: ARIN-PPML [m