I do not support this policy for the reasons Kevin and Albert outlined.
This seems a bit premature.
Thanks,
Austin Murkland
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:40 PM, ARIN wrote:
> On 15 June 2017, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) advanced "ARIN-prop-242:
> Retire Obsolete Section 4 From the NRPM" to Draf
Please, Remove me from this list!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 21, 2017, at 8:13 AM, Kevin Blumberg wrote:
>
> I do not support this policy. At a minimum, it would remove both the 4.4
> Micro Allocations and 4.10 Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6
> Deployment. Both of those sections hav
I also do not support this policy.
As pointed out, there are at least 2 blocks of v4 space reserved and still
available for allocation. Also, although returns are not frequent, and
the "winners" come from the wait list, these regular allocations (although
not very often) happen from time to t
I do not support this policy. At a minimum, it would remove both the 4.4 Micro
Allocations and 4.10 Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 Deployment. Both
of those sections have reserved space and are "active" in Section 4.
Thanks,
Kevin Blumberg
-Original Message-
From: ARIN-PPML [m