Re: [arin-ppml] IPv4 SWIP requirements (?)

Correction…. fingers got ahead of brain… I meant to say 47. Owen > On Jun 28, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > Based on William’s logic below, I would advocate for 49. > > Owen > >> On Jun 19, 2017, at 8:05 PM, William Herrin > > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2

Re: [arin-ppml] IPv4 SWIP requirements (?)

> On Jun 19, 2017, at 10:00 PM, Kevin Blumberg wrote: > > David, > > My understanding of best practices was /56 for residential and /48 for > business. Your understanding is not correct. Best practice is /48 for everyone. Common practice differs from best practice as usual. > > My hesita

Re: [arin-ppml] IPv4 SWIP requirements (?)

Based on William’s logic below, I would advocate for 49. Owen > On Jun 19, 2017, at 8:05 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:37 PM, David R Huberman > wrote: > Based on comments so far, most agree that a /48 should be SWIP'ed since it is > routable

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-6: Improve Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR Transfers

Bill, That’s not particularly relevant as LIRs are not at issue in the policy proposal. It speaks only to RIRs (i.e. AfriNIC, APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC, RIPE-NCC) and NIRs (e.g. JPNIC, CNNIC, KRNIC, …). Owen > On Jun 20, 2017, at 10:33 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:37 PM