Your wording is simpler and better. Just saying "static" and "/64 or
more" clarifies all the ambiguous situations.
Unless someone has a good argument why a recipient would only want part
of their assignment registered, that seems to be a non-issue. In any
case, in such an event, the ISP could
I'm in favor of this draft and +1 Albert's suggested language for wording
changes.
--
Brian
E Jones
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:10 AM, wrote:
> I am in favor of the draft, with or without the changes to make it clearer.
>
> I suggest the following language for clarity:
>
> 3) Add new section
I am in favor of the draft, with or without the changes to make it
clearer.
I suggest the following language for clarity:
3) Add new section 6.5.5.4 "Downstream Registration Requests" to the NRPM
that reads "If the downstream recipient of a static assignment of /64 or
more addresses requests
