Correction…
APNIC and RIPE already have policy to support this process with no utilization.
Owen
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 16:03 , Mike Burns wrote:
>
>
> I support the policy and note that:
>
> The costs to implement are practically zero.
> Some community members have requested this ability, w
I support the policy and note that: The costs to implement are practically
zero. Some community members have requested this ability, who are we to gainsay
their reasons? The changes to the NRPM are tiny and discrete. No downsides to
the implementation this policy have been offered in any comment
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 15:52 , Scott Leibrand wrote:
>
> If you operate a network with peering sessions, and you are forced to
> renumber your ASN, you either need to convince all of your peers to set up
> new sessions (which can be a lot of work, and usually means at least some of
> them wil
+1
Steven Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099 - Office
770.392.0076 - Fax
[Description: Description: Eclipse Networks Logo_small.png]℠ Eclipse Networks,
Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
From: ARIN-PPML On Behalf Of
If you operate a network with peering sessions, and you are forced to
renumber your ASN, you either need to convince all of your peers to set up
new sessions (which can be a lot of work, and usually means at least some
of them will refuse/fail to do so), or you need to local-as prepend the old
ASN
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 01:23, Larry Ash wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:47:09 -0700
> Owen DeLong wrote:
> >> On Aug 13, 2018, at 14:42 , Job Snijders wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree with the proposal.
> >>
> >> I think this proposal is needed and addresses practical concerns: the
> alternative to t
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:47:09 -0700
Owen DeLong wrote:
On Aug 13, 2018, at 14:42 , Job Snijders wrote:
I agree with the proposal.
I think this proposal is needed and addresses practical concerns: the alternative to transfers is “renumbering”, and renumbering
ASNs is a very costly and oper
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 00:48, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > On Aug 13, 2018, at 14:42 , Job Snijders wrote:
> >
> > I agree with the proposal.
> >
> > I think this proposal is needed and addresses practical concerns: the
> alternative to transfers is “renumbering”, and renumbering ASNs is a very
> cost
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 14:42 , Job Snijders wrote:
>
> I agree with the proposal.
>
> I think this proposal is needed and addresses practical concerns: the
> alternative to transfers is “renumbering”, and renumbering ASNs is a very
> costly and operationally risky proposition. There is no ups
I agree with the proposal.
I think this proposal is needed and addresses practical concerns: the
alternative to transfers is “renumbering”, and renumbering ASNs is a very
costly and operationally risky proposition. There is no upside to
restricting or forbidding this type of resource transfer.
A
The AC has recently been discussing this draft policy and noted that we
have not heard from the community since this new text has been posted.
We would like to hear from you on if we should move this policy to
recommended.
I believe the new text fixes the discrepancy, for initial ISP
alloca
I should have waited a few extra minutes before replying ...
I'm ok with this new text wording.
Thanks!
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: ARIN-PPML en nombre de ARIN
Fecha: lunes, 13 de agosto de 2018, 12:39
Para:
Asunto: [arin-ppml] Revised/Retitled - Draft
The following has been revised and retitled:
* Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on Temporary Sub-Assignments
Formerly:
* Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments
Revised text is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2018_4.html
You are
I still feel this is a pony. A largely unnecessary solution looking for a tiny
number of niche problems.
Owen
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 10:01, WOOD Alison * DAS wrote:
>
> ARIN Community:
>
> As we approach the next ARIN meeting, I would like to remind the community of
> the proposal to allow
Hi all,
I believe the new wording is sufficiently clear. Thanks for that!
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: ARIN-PPML en nombre de ARIN
Fecha: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2018, 13:48
Para:
Asunto: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on IPv6
ARIN Community:
As we approach the next ARIN meeting, I would like to remind the community of
the proposal to allow inter-regional ASN transfers. I will be presenting this
topic at the meeting and would love to address any comments or questions on
this proposal. Please feel free to email the
16 matches
Mail list logo
