I think the key here is that making the policy more clear is an improvement.
This is almost equally a problem in IPv4 and IPv6. It really doesn’t differ.
The main reason nobody really noticed it in IPv4 is because we avoided the more
nonsensical pedantic application of the policy and went with
I support this policy. It aligns with the transfer policy better and clarifies
initial allocation in section 4.2.2.
--
Brian E Jones
bjo...@vt.edu
> On Jun 23, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Kerrie Vassall-Richards
> wrote:
>
>
> Clarification to ISP initial allocation and permit renumbering
> Proposal
