Total of 6 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Oct 26 00:53:03 EDT 2018
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
16.67% |1 | 19.86% |25318 | far...@umn.edu
16.67% |1 | 19.23% |24513 | m...@brainiacsquad.c
I like this approach. However, I have a question, do all the POC objects
need to be valid or does at least one of the POC objects need to be valid?
If we care we might want to be more specific on that point, I think it is
possible to read the current text either way right now.
I think I like at l
This seems completely reasonable to me.
--
Brian E Jones, CSP-SM, CSP-PO
NI&S Virginia Tech
bjo...@vt.edu
> On Oct 20, 2018, at 2:14 PM, Andrew Dul wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose to the community a rewrite of 2017-12 that would
> hopefully bring it in line with the Implementation B option of t
