Re: [arin-ppml] Is it time to start requirement to have IPv6 in place before receiving Section 8.5 transfered IPv4 addresses?

2019-09-05 Thread Michael Williams via ARIN-PPML
I agree with David. Whilst I wish people would use IPv6, RIPE tried something similar (although didn’t truly measure operational use) and failed miserably. They rolled back conditioning the provisioning if IPv4 resources upon IPv6 because recipients were just receiving IPv6 and never using it... S

Re: [arin-ppml] Is it time to start requirement to have IPv6 in place before receiving Section 8.5 transfered IPv4 addresses?

2019-09-05 Thread hostmaster
Been distracted by hurricane preps, so my response is a bit delayed. I agree that a policy requiring IPv6 resources before allowing IPv4 directed transfers have to be "objective" so that ARIN staff can easily determine if the requirement is being met. At the low end of my proposal, the receiv

[arin-ppml] Weekly posting summary for p...@arin.net

2019-09-05 Thread narten
Total of 1 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 6 00:53:04 EDT 2019 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 100.00% |1 |100.00% |10429 | nar...@us.ibm.com +--++--+--