> whois 103.60.14.185
> % [whois.apnic.net
..
> Comments? (Yes, correct information can be gained from visiting the
> appropriate RIR site, but the main database should have correct information
> as well)
>
There is no “main" database. Your whois client decided to use
whois.apnic.net <
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:35 AM Michael Peddemors
wrote:
>
> whois 103.60.14.185
> % [whois.apnic.net]
> % Whois data copyright termshttp://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html
>
> % Information related to '103.60.12.0 - 103.60.15.255'
>
> % Abuse contact for '103.60.12.0 - 103.60.1
whois 103.60.14.185
% [whois.apnic.net]
% Whois data copyright termshttp://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html
% Information related to '103.60.12.0 - 103.60.15.255'
% Abuse contact for '103.60.12.0 - 103.60.15.255' is 'no-em...@apnic.net'
inetnum:103.60.12.0 - 103.60.15.255
netname:
> John Curran wrote :
> [arin-announce] ARIN Announces New Relying Party Agreement (RPA) To Spur Use
> of RPKI
Thanks ! a long awaited improvement and definitely in the right direction.
Let's hope that it will be palatable enough to third parties to start dropping
invalid prefixes.
Michel.
___
In message <4a9ea7f6-c870-43c6-9c19-52390806e...@arin.net>,
John Curran wrote:
> https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/documents/employee_policies/#ethics
> https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/documents/employee_policies/#conflict
Thanks again John. Excellent clarity.
Regards,
rfg
___
In message <0da0cda2-2295-43c0-a7da-71df8c34e...@arin.net>,
John Curran wrote:
>FYI,
Good stuff John! I feel sure that these many small adjustments will be
significantly helpful.
Kudos to you & your whole team for working to address the various concerns
that have, allegedly, tended to hamper
John,
I am encouraged by these changes, however, I don't think they go far enough.
I've been thinking about these issues for a while now, particularly the
issue of requiring a valid and binding Relying Party Agreement (RPA) on a
global basis. In my opinion, this seems to run counter to at least t
On 16 Oct 2019, at 5:15 AM, John Curran wrote:
>
> On 16 Oct 2019, at 5:07 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>>
>> In message ,
>> John Curran wrote:
>>
>>> A very reasonable question, and the answer is: yes, there are policies in
>>> place to prevent ARIN employees from situations that mi
FYI,
/John
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN mailto:i...@arin.net>>
Subject: [arin-announce] ARIN Announces New Relying Party Agreement (RPA) To
Spur Use of RPKI
Date: 21 October 2019 at 10:52:40 AM PDT
To: mailto:arin-annou...@arin.net>>
Today, ARIN published a new Relying Party Agreement (R
